Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />5 <br />In years classified as dry or moderately dry, the difference between the Action and No Action <br />alternatives, in terms of minimum duration, can have a significant impact on the reservoir <br />elevation. When dry years occur in series, which is often the case, the year to year differences in <br />reservoir elevation caused by the operational regime can compound upon each other as shown in <br />this case. <br />T; ..,,.. 7 rlnflav tha Mnct Tntanca Thri o VPar Drv Cycle <br />Flaming Gorge Model Results Comparison <br />Driest Three Year Cycle Release Hyidrogiaph <br />151J00 - -- <br />14000 <br /> -Action Alternative <br />13DOD -NoActior Alternative <br />- <br />- <br />12000 <br />11000 <br />10000 -- - <br />9000 <br />8000 <br />° <br />-- <br />r? <br />7000 <br />O <br />6000 <br />5000 <br />4000 <br />3000 <br />2000 <br />1000 <br />D <br />Jan-02 Jul-02 Jan-113 Jul-03 Jan-04 Jul-04 Jan-05 Jul-05 Jan-06 <br />Date <br />When conditions are wet, the Action and No Action alternatives operate Flaming Gorge <br />Dam very differently from when conditions are dry. Spring releases for the Action alternative in <br />wet years are typically larger than those generated for the No Action alternative as a result of <br />attempting to achieve specific targets established for Reach Two. This is evident in Figure 3, <br />which shows the reservoir elevations that occurred during the most intense three year wet cycle <br />found in the inflow hydrology. The higher releases that occur each spring under the Action <br />alternative cause the reservoir to fill less in the spring as compared to the No Action alternative. <br />As a result, the releases under the Action alternative during the baseflow period are not as high as <br />those that occur under the No Action alternative. The No Action alternative is forced to release <br />greater volumes during the baseflow period to achieve the drawdown target established for the <br />following year. This can be seen in Figure 4, which shows the daily release hydrographs that <br />occurred during this three year wet cycle. In November, the release constraints of the No Action <br />Figure 3 Reservoir Elevations Under the Most Intense Three Year Wet Cycle