Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />I5 <br /> Base Flows - Reach One <br /> August through Fehuary <br />------ <br /> 5000 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 4000 <br /> <br /> 000 <br /> <br /> <br />u., <br /> ?000 <br /> <br /> 1000 <br /> 40,4 60cT, <br /> Percent.we Etceedance <br />Reach Two Spring Peak Flow Results <br />Figures 16, 17 and 18 show the distributions of modeled spring peak flows that occurred in <br />Reach Two. Figure 16 shows the distribution of peak flows having a duration of one day while <br />Figure 17 and 18 show distributions for peak flows having durations of two and four weeks, <br />respectively. For perspective, the historic peak flows during the period from 1971 though 1991 <br />are included on each of these figures. While the distributions of the Action and No Action peak <br />flows are similar, there are notable differences at specific percentage exceedances. This is <br />evident in Figure 16 where the distribution for the Action alternative noticeably deviates from the <br />No Action alternative at about 13% exceedance. Similar deviations occur in the Action alternative <br />at 10% and 40% exceedance levels for the two week duration peak flows. In the four week <br />duration peak flows, a deviation in the Action distribution occurs at about 10% exceedance. All of <br />these deviations indicate where peak flows were increased by the Action alternative in order to <br />achieve the specific targets of the 2000 Flow Recommendations. <br />Figure 16 Distribution of Peak Flows (One Day Duration) in Reach Two <br /> - No Action <br />- Action <br />- Historical (71-91 ) <br /> - FG linre?* (71-91 ) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />