Laserfiche WebLink
Basics of Colorado 1Nater Lave <br />priority occur when there is an approved <br />replacement water supply plan in place <br />that would allow out-of-priority diver- <br />sions (see Augmentation Plans, <br />Exchanges, and Substitute Supply Plans, <br />p.15, 16, 17), because of a statutory <br />exemption from administration (see <br />Exempt and Non-Exempt Wells, p. 17), <br />or in instances of a futile call (see Futile <br />Call, p.32). <br />Beneficial Use <br />Beneficial use is the basis, measure, <br />and limit of a water right. Colorado law <br />broadly defines beneficial use of water as a <br />lawful appropriation that employs reason- <br />ably efficient practices to put that water to <br />use without waste. <br />What is reasonable depends on the <br />type of use and how the water is with- <br />drawn and applied. The goal is to avoid <br />water waste, so that the water resource is <br />available to as many water rights holders <br />as possible. <br />Over time, the uses of water consid- <br />ered "beneficial" have increased in <br />response to the changing economic and <br />community values of Colorado's citizens. <br />Recognized beneficial uses now include <br />among others: <br />• Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board instream flows <br />• Commercial <br />• Domestic <br />• Dust suppression <br />• Fire protection <br />• Fish and wildlife culture <br />• Flood control <br />• In-channel recreational diversions for <br />rafting and kayaking <br />• Indusu-ial <br />• Irrigation <br />• Mined land reclamation <br />• Municipal <br />• Nature centers <br />• Power generation <br />• Recreation <br />• Release from storage for boating <br />and fishing flows <br />Domestic Preference <br />The Colorado Constitution provides in times of shortage that domestic water <br />use has preference over any other purpose, and that agricultural use has prefer- <br />ence over manufaeuiring use. <br />In an early 20th century court case pitting a junior municipal use against a <br />senior irrigation use, the Colorado Supreme Court said that this provision did not <br />intend to alter tl.~e priority system. I-Iowever, it does give mttnicipalitics the power <br />to condemn water eights, if the owners of those water rights are paid just com- <br />pensation. For example, in 19ll the City of Grand Jtimction used this power to <br />condemn water rights others had previously held on Kannah Creel<. <br />Municipal and domestic use currently amounts to about 10 percent of water <br />consumption in Colorado; agriculture, about 85 percent; and all other uses <br />some 5 percent. <br />• Snowmaking <br />• Stock watering <br />Colorado's prior appropriation doctrine <br />has evolved to include beneficial uses that <br />were pre~~iously thought to be incompatible <br />with Colorado's constitution. In 1973, for <br />example, the State Legislature recognized <br />the "need to correlate the activities of <br />mankind with some reasonable preservation <br />of the natural en~nronment." To accomplish <br />this, it created the Instream Flow Program <br />within a state agency, the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board (CWCB). <br />Newly-appropriated instream flows are <br />the minimum stream flows or lake levels <br />needed to preserve the natural environment <br />to a reasonable degree. The CWCB current- <br />ly holds instream flow rights on 8,000 miles <br />of Colorado streams and 486 lakes. <br />In 2002, the Legislature enacted a <br />new law allowing the state to also acquire <br />senior water rights to improve stream con- <br />ditions by donation, lease, or purchase. <br />The CWCB is the only entity legally per- <br />mitted under state law to hold instream <br />flow water rights. <br />C I T I Z E N S G U I D E T^ C^ L^ R A D ^ W ATE R L A W ~ 7 <br />