My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9540
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9540
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/24/2009 7:17:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9540
Author
Christopherson, K., G. J. Birchell and T. Modde.
Title
Larval Razorback Sucker and Bonytail Survival and Growth in the Presence of Nonnative Fish in the Stipprup Floodplain.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
Salt Lake City, UT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />stocked into the sma1124.28 mZ enclosure. This small enclosure was used as a control to test <br />larval razorback sucker and bonytail survival without nonnative fish present. <br />The study design was the same for the bonytail. It included two densities of bonytail <br />(high and low-density) introduced into enclosures with approximately equal numbers of <br />nonnative adults (Table 1). On May 8, 2002, approximately 71,500 bonytail larvae were <br />introduced in the high-density enclosure and 21,2501arvae introduced into the low-density <br />enclosure. An additional 5,2501arvae were introduced into the smaller control enclosure. <br />Dexter National Fish Hatchery and Technology Center provided the bonytail larvae, which were <br />introduced into the same enclosures with razorback sucker and thus experienced similar exposure <br />to nonnative fish. <br />Fyke nets (0.32 cm and 0.64 cm mesh) were used for sampling outside enclosures. Only <br />nets with 0.32 cm mesh were used inside the enclosures. On June 22, preliminary sampling was <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />conducted to measure the growth of razorback sucker and bonytail. A 50-individual sub-sample <br />was used. Sampling within enclosures occurred again in the first two weeks of August. <br />Inside the enclosures, nets were set in a star pattern, alternating between low and high- <br />density sites for five days. Fish captured inside the enclosures were counted and released into ~ <br />the floodplain outside the enclosures. All nonnative fish captured were removed during <br />sampling. Population estimates with 95% confidence limits for razorback suckers and nonnative <br />fish inside the enclosures and nonnative fish outside enclosures, were calculated using depletion ~ <br />techniques. Depletion techniques were used inside the enclosure because the level of sampling <br />was great enough to capture most of the fish. The number of bonytail in each enclosure was <br />calculated using the removal estimator [M(bh)] from the computer software CAPTURE. 7 <br />Intensive sampling for population estimation outside the enclosures occurred the last <br />week of July. This was done to measure the level of escapement from the enclosures. Nets were <br />set outside the enclosures for four consecutive days. Razorback suckers captured outside the ~ <br />enclosures were marked by removing the right pelvic fin. The main wetland outside the <br />6 , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.