Laserfiche WebLink
Several shifts in the fish community were observed as result of the 1993 flows, which <br />would support a peak flow of 25,000 cfs and the preceding recommendation: 1) channel <br />catfish did not successfully reproduce or recruit; both native catostomids appear to have <br />recruited well for the first time since 1989. In addition, the abundance of nonnative <br />cyprinids was negatively correlated with the peak. <br />During-dry years (e.g. 1994) a low peak and summer and late season flows <br />maintained at moderate levels (below 4000 cfs and above 2000 cfs) to provide stable <br />backwater and shoreline habitats appear to benefit Gila spp <br />• Flows observed in 1995 (peak of 29,800 cfs occurring late in the year), did not appear to <br />immediately benefit the native species, nor did they appear to negatively impact channel <br />r-.i catfish. However, incorporating earlier Deso/Gray monitoring data (1989 - 1991) and <br />"~ data collected subsequent to the subject studies (1997 and 1.998) it appears that the <br />periods of high flows (mid-1980' and mid-1990's) tend to benefit the Deso/Gray native <br />fish community. Similar. findings were reported in Westwater Canyon when longterm <br />'~ data were considered there (Chart and Lentsch 1998). <br />_~ <br />There have been direct links made between high flows and the availability of flood plain <br />habitat in the Green River upstream ofDeso/Gray. Those relationships should drive a <br />spring runoff flow recommendation (magnitude and duration) for the Green River. <br />However, based on the information referenced above, those recommendations will likely <br />~. ' benefit the Deso/Gray fish community as well. <br />Future Work <br />• YOY chub numbers and were highest in Desolation Canyon (above RK 249.4). This may <br />~~. <br />indicate that spawnng sites were primarily in this reach. Monitoring of spawning <br />locations, and searching for additional sites, in Desolation Canyon should continue. <br />The Three Fords spawning site is important to Colorado pikeminnow. Monitoring and <br />preservation of this site should remain a priority for the lower Green River. A population <br />estimate of spawning pikeminnow would be valuable in measuring recovery. <br />Numbers of endangered fish is highly variable between years and between river reaches. <br />Monitoring for YOY fish should be conducted twice yearly (early August and late <br />September) in both flood plain and canyon bound reaches. The incorporation of a fall <br />monitoring effort in Deso/Gray will be critical if assessing pikeininnow reproductive <br />success in the canyons is warranted by the Recovery Program. <br />• Recent studies have shown that YOY chubs in canyon-bound river reaches do not select <br />for backwater habitats (Valdez and Ryel 1995; Chart and Lentsch 1998). Future <br />-~ monitoring efforts for YOY chubs in Deso/Gray should target a variety of low velocity <br />shoreline habitats. <br />t~ '{ <br />~,, <br />xxii <br />