Laserfiche WebLink
Turbidity was more variable in 1996 because of several late summer storm events. These <br />conditions may be more productive than 1995 and slightly greater mean total length (34.6 mm) <br />was measured. This small difference in total length may not be significant. This may indicate an <br />environmental threshold for increased recruitment was reached in 1994, but not reached in 1996 <br />even though conditions were better than 1995. The results of monitoring efforts were <br />incorporated in Table 2 above and increase the flow year - YOY chub cohort comparisons by two <br />years (1992 and 1993). Unfortunately, increasing the sample size from 3 to 5 did not increase <br />our ability to statistically predict reproductive success based on flows. It is apparent that chubs <br />in Deso/Gray reproduced successfully over a wide range of flows. <br />Growth of YOY and time of spawn were also reported as result of the monitoring efforts; <br />1.992-1996. Prior to the nursery habitat study the opportunity arose for some ancillary YOY <br />sampling in 1992 (9-14 September) and 1993 (12-15 July), which provided a second look at <br />those year's YOY chub cohorts. Low velocity habitat sampling in September 1992 revealed one <br />YOY chub (trip CPE = 0.0017) which corroborated the findings of low Gila spp. reproduction <br />determined earlier that year (during the July monitoring trip). In July 1993, 26 YOY chubs (avg <br />TL = 18.9 mm) were collected which was the first indication of the stronger year class detected <br />in the monitoring effort later that year. A length frequency comparison of the two collections of <br />the 1.993 Age-0 cohort provided a basis for an analysis of YOY chub growth rates and hatching <br />times (Report C: Figure 5). The July 1993 distribution of Age 0 chub lengths reveals a single <br />modal peak at 19 mrn TL. Days post-Batch were back calculated first by converting total. length <br />to standard length (Chart and Lentsch 1998b) and then applying formula developed by Muth <br />(1990). Results of this analysis indicated the majority of chubs collected 12-15 July 1993 <br />hatched on June 21 and were spawned June 16 (back calculated dates offer only an <br />approximation of life history events). Green River flows were 14,000 cfs and 16,700 cfs on the <br />estimated spawn and hatch dates, respectively. The length frequency analysis of the August <br />1993 catch reveals a more scattered bi-modal distribution of Age-0 chubs. The first peak occurs <br />at 30 mm TL. Applying the methodology described above we back calculate a hatch date of <br />July 13 and spawn date of July 8 for this younger contingent of chubs collected in August 1993. <br />The second peak at 46 mm TL is much less discrete. These fish were too large to back calculate <br />hatching dates, but were presumed to be the group of fish sampled earlier in July. Based on this <br />assumption, Age 0 chubs grew, on average, at a rate of 0.36 mm/day from mid July to late <br />August. Green River flows averaged 2,924 cfs, and river temperatures averaged 24.5 C during <br />that growth period. <br />Chub CPUE was positively correlated with CPUE'for five other species. These <br />correlations were weak, but statistically significant (Colorado pikeminnow, r-2=0.008; bluehead <br />sucker, rz=0.04; red shiner, r2=0.02; fathead minnow, ~=0.05; and sand shiner, rZ=0.006). <br />Because this study was predicated on the previous findings of the importance of <br />backwater habitats to YOY chubs, no attempt was made to sample other habitat types. Therefore, <br />it is not possible to address the question of use of habitats having measurable flow. The <br />characteristics of backwaters used by YOY chubs can be described. Mean depth of backwaters <br />used by chubs was 0.59 m, almost exactly that reported by Valdez and Clemmer (1982). Mean <br />depth of backwaters used by chubs was 0.09 m greater than that for habitats not used by YOY <br />chubs. <br />~..., ~. <br />,. <br />--, <br />__ <br />xii <br />