Laserfiche WebLink
WESTWATER CAN.: IBNER~ CAB.(RY 124.1) WESTWATER CI1DL: OOtJCiAR BAR (RM 121.5) <br />3S 5.5 <br />~ ~ <br />_~ T _~ <br />W h <br />2 2 Z = <br />~ ~ <br />15 ~ 1.6 <br />N _ <br />N <br />1 ~ 1 <br />W ty <br />vos T v~ <br />o <br />1088 1989 1000 1901 1992 1993 1004 1095 1906 ° 1088 1089 1090 1001 1902 1055 1004 1996 1006 <br />~l~®RT AFB®RT <br />WESTWATER G4N.: NADES BAR (RM 120.0) . <br />~.5 <br />,.., 3 <br />D: <br />O <br />_ ~` <br />m <br />Z ~ <br />~ 1.5 <br />S <br />N <br />= 1 <br />41 <br />a T <br />` U 0.5 ~ <br />i - - <br />0 <br />1068 1989 1090 1001 i902 1090 1004 1005 1006 <br />' X163®~ <br />'. <br />Figure 16. ~A longterm comparison of humpback and roundtail chub standardized trammel net <br />catch rates (fish /23m net hour) with S.E. bars at three sampling sites in Westwater Canyon, <br />Colorado Rivet, 1988 -1996. All daxa collected between late August and early October. <br />In 1990, the shift fi-om humpbacks to roundtails was first detected at Mner's Cabin, ax the upper <br />terminus of Westwater Canyon. A similar shift was detected two years later at the two lower <br />sites. Seperal years of low flows preceded 1990 and continued until 1993. It was assumed the <br />shift in Gila spp, abundance was related to that dry cycle. The high flows of 1993. and 1995, <br />appear to have reestablished a balance of these two native speaes. Project catch rates were lower <br />than those recorded when UDWR started monitoring the canyon chubs in i 988, however there <br />were differences in sampling protocols. <br />DRAFT <br />36 <br />