My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8291
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8291
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/24/2009 7:15:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8291
Author
Chart, T. E. and L. D. Lentsch.
Title
Flow Effects on Humpback Chub (Gila Cypha) Populations in Westwater Canyon.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
Aspinal-46,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Late Juvenile and Adult Monitoring <br />The late juvenile and adult fish community was sampled on twelve occasions throughout the five <br />year study. The overwhelming majority of effort was expended in the upper canyon (upstream of <br />the major rapids in. Westwater Canyon), i.e. between RM 124.5 and 119.5. Humpback chubs <br />were collected on every occasion at every site sampled in the upper canyon. On two occasions <br />sampling occurred in the lower canyon (below the rapids) at RM 114.3 in April of 1992 and at <br />RM 116.5 in July of the same year. Humpback chub were not collected in the lower canyon and <br />roundtail chubs were collected in lower than upstream. [YOY CPEs were significanlty less from <br />this area of the canyon]. For this reason, subsequent to July i 992, sampling was concentrated in <br />the upper canyon. <br />Native species dominated the collections of larger sized fish, both along the shorelines <br />(electrofishing and hoop netting) and in the main channel (trammel netting). Native chubs <br />accounted for 57.4% and 71.4% of the electrofishing and hoop net catch, respectively, with the <br />overwhelming majority of those fishes collected electrofishing (Figures 12). Roundtail chubs <br />were the most abundant species collected at the Miner's Cabin site, but were outnumbered by <br />unidentified juvenile chubs at the lower two. Main channel habitats were sampled with trammel <br />nets. More effort was expended on this technique than any other and itproduced 57.3% of our <br />total catch (N=3992). Native chubs dominated the trammel net catch; humpback chubs <br />accounted for 28.6% of the total catch, roundtail chubs were the most abundant species <br />accounting for 37.3%, and unidentified chubs comprised 6.4% all sites combined (Figure 13). <br />Again roundtail chubs were the most numerous species collected throughout the study at each of <br />the three intensively sampled sites followed closely by humpback chubs. Juvenile Gila spp. and <br />other unidentified adult chubs were more abundant at the two lower sites but did not comprise <br />more than 10 % of the total trammel net catch at any location. <br />DRAFT <br />' 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.