Laserfiche WebLink
carbon at site 6 in March 2000 compared to August <br />1999 probably resulted from flushing of the land <br />surface by melting snow and ice along unsampled trib- <br />utaries and the Yampa River valley between sites 5 and <br />6 during March 2000. This hypothesis is indicated by a <br />133-ft3/s increase in discharge between sites 5 and 6 <br />during March 2000 compared to a 36-ft3/s increase <br />during August 1999. <br />Synoptic sampling during March 2000 showed a <br />downstream distribution of pH (fig. 14) similar to the <br />synoptic sampling during August 1999 (fig. 5). The <br />largest difference was at Yampa River below Stage- <br />coach Reservoir (site 1), where pH measured 7.77 in <br />March 2000 (compared to 8.46 in August 1999). <br />According to calculations using PHREEQC, this lower <br />pH during March 2000 implies that COz was at 1,000 <br />percent of saturation (compared to <br />300 percent during August 1999), probably because of <br />winter stratification of Stagecoach Reservoir. <br />Downstream from site 1, pH at Yampa River <br />sites (fig. 14) averaged 8.85 during March 2000 <br />(compared to 8.70 during August 1999), reflecting an <br />average PCp (fig. 14) of 67 percent of saturation <br />(compared to 99 percent during August 1999). <br />Dissolved oxygen concentrations averaged <br />119 percent of saturation at Yampa River sites down- <br />stream from site 1 during both sampling periods <br />(figs. 5 and 14), but, because dissolved oxygen <br />concentrations were about 40 percent larger at those <br />sites during March 2000 (averaging 12.2 mg/L) than <br />during August 1999 (averaging 8.6 mg/L), photosyn- <br />thesis increased dissolved oxygen concentrations <br />about 40 percent more during March 2000 than during <br />August 1999. These relations indicate greater effect of <br />photosynthesis on pH and dissolved oxygen concen- <br />trations during March 2000 than during August 1999, <br />despite shorter days and colder water temperatures in <br />March 2000. However, this conclusion does not imply <br />that rates of photosynthesis were greater during March <br />2000. Greater increase in pH and in dissolved oxygen <br />concentrations by photosynthesis during March 2000 <br />probably can be attributed to (1) slower rates of <br />exchange of CO2 into and dissolved oxygen out of the <br />river because of colder water temperature and deeper <br />water and (2) slower rates of CO2 production and <br />oxygen consumption resulting from slower rates of <br />respiration by organisms and of aerobic decomposition <br />of organic matter in the colder river water and <br />streambed sediment. <br />Calculations using PHREEQC indicate that <br />synoptic samples collected at Yampa River sites <br />during March 2000, if equilibrated with local, atmo- <br />spheric PCp ,would have pH in the narrow range of <br />8.64 to 8.772(average 8.69)(fig. 15), compared to 8.55 <br />to 8.80 (average 8.67) during August 1999 (fig. 6). <br />These calculations indicate that the high alkalinity of <br />Yampa River water causes high pH that is further <br />elevated by CO2 removal during photosynthesis. <br />Calculations using PHREEQC indicate that <br />synoptic samples collected at Yampa River sites <br />(except site 1) during March 2000 were oversaturated <br />with calcite (fig. 14); the sample from site 1 was near <br />saturation because of relatively small pH. Excluding <br />site 1, the average saturation index was 0.98 during <br />March 2000, compared to 0.84 during August 1999 <br />(fig. 5), indicating greater oversaturation during March <br />2000-mostly a result of higher pH, alkalinity, and <br />concentration of calcium. Additional calculations <br />using PHREEQC indicate that synoptic samples <br />collected at Yampa River sites during March 2000, if <br />equilibrated with local, atmospheric PCO2 and calcite, <br />would have pH in the narrow range of 8.43 to 8.50 <br />(average 8.45) (fig. 15), compared to 8.42 to 8.50 <br />(average 8.45) during August 1.999 (fig. 6). The <br />general agreement of simulated pH values for the two <br />sampling periods indicates that pH in the Yampa River <br />was largely controlled by degree of PCp saturation <br />and degree of oversaturation with calcite during both <br />sampling periods. <br />Estimate of Maximum Potential <br />Late-Afternoon pH in the Lower <br />Yampa River Basin <br />Enhanced photosynthesis and increased alka- <br />linity in the lower Yampa River Basin have the poten- <br />tial to increase maximum diurnal (late-afternoon) pH. <br />To estimate maximum potential pH at water-quality <br />sites in the lower Yampa River Basin, water-quality <br />samples collected at Yampa River above Elk River <br />(site 3, fig. 1) on August 18, 1999, and March 13, <br />2000, were selected to represent hypothetical, poten- <br />tial conditions of photosynthesis in the lower basin. <br />PHREEQC was used to calculate the difference in the <br />concentration of CO2 gas in the synoptic samples from <br />site 3 at measured pH and the concentration in the <br />samples at equilibrium with ambient atmospheric <br />PCp2. These calculations indicate that, relative to CO2 <br />concentrations in equilibrium with the atmosphere at <br />20 Evaluation of Trends in pH in the Yampa River, Northwestern Colorado, 1950-2000 <br />