My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8278
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8278
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/24/2009 7:13:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8278
Author
Cavalli, P. A.
Title
An Evaluation of the Effects of Tusher Wash Diversion Dam on movement and Survival of Juvenile and Subadult Native Fish.
USFW Year
2000.
USFW - Doc Type
Salt Lake City.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
entrainment of larval fish is to reduce flows in the raceway during the larval drift periods. A <br />reduction in the amount of water diverted would probably reduce entrainment of all life stages of <br />endangered fish, but the cost of such an action (reduced crop production and power generation) <br />could be substantial. A comparison of the costs associated with fish exclusion structures to the <br />costs associated with reducing diversion of water during the larval drift periods should be <br />completed in order to help make decisions about modifications to the raceway that may be <br />needed to protect endangered fish. <br />Tusher Wash Diversion Dam, Thayn Power Plant and pump station, and the Green River <br />Canal appear to have a negative affect on subadult fish. Large numbers of native fish, including <br />a razorback sucker, were found impinged on the grate in front of the power plant and pump <br />station. No endangered fish have been found on the grate since the wall in front of the power <br />plant was removed, but adult Colorado pikeminnow were caught with electrofishing gear in the <br />Green River Canal during the summer of 2000 (Tim Modde, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, <br />personal communication). Few fish were found in the Green River Canal when it was dry, but <br />these numbers were probably affected by diversion of water out of the canal through sluice gates <br />and the removal of fish by scavengers before sampling occurred; tracks from birds, humans, and <br />other mammals were noted throughout the canal system. Fishing tackle was also found in the <br />Green River Canal; local fishermen often catch fish in the canal, and some people walk the canal <br />when it is dry to capture stranded fish (Kim Olson, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, <br />personal communication). Glen Baxter (personal communication), along time resident of Green <br />River, Utah reported having seen a 38 pound catfish that was caught in the canal several years <br />ago, and another resident claimed to have found Colorado pikeminnow in his ditch at the end of <br />the imgation season (Frank Vetere, personal communication with Jeff Beck, Utah Division of <br />Wildlife Resources). These findings and anecdotal reports suggest that modifications are needed <br />to keep subadult and adult fish from entering the canal system. However, the debris carried by <br />the Green River will have to be factored into the design of the modifications in order to keep <br />maintenance costs at a reasonable level. <br />Tusher Wash Diversion Dam does not appear to be a complete barrier to upstream <br />movement by subadult fish when flows are at least 4,800 cfs. The average catch rate and average <br />size of most species were not different upstream of the dam compared to downstream of the dam. <br />The differences in catch rates or average size that were noted can probably be explained by <br />factors such as small sample sizes (e.g. only three Colorado pikeminnow were captured upstream <br />from the dam) or differences in habitat availability (e.g. all of the Gila spp. were captured near <br />Swasey's Rapid, which is found above the diversion dam; at this point, the valley becomes wider <br />and the average gradient declines. Consequently, riffles are rare and there are no rapids and <br />below this point, while both of these habitat types are common above this point). The lack of <br />significant differences could be explained by either similar production and growth upstream and <br />downstream from the dam or by movement of all sizes offish across the dam. However, <br />flannelmouth suckers, bluehead suckers, and channel catfish were documented to move upstream <br />past the dam. Therefore, it seems likely that fish passage at the dam is possible when flows are <br />approximately 4,800 cfs. However, the average base flow during recent years has been <br />approximately 2,500 cfs. It is still unknown whether or not subadult fish can move upstream past <br />Tusher Wash Diversion Dam during periods when the discharge is closer to average base flow <br />conditions. <br />None of the radio-tagged Colorado pikeminnow were found to move upstream past <br />Tusher Wash Diversion Dam. One fish was found in the same location for several weeks. This <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.