Laserfiche WebLink
identified, measured, weighed, and released. The net was set frequently in 1996, but it was used <br />only twice in 1997 due to higher discharge. <br />Collapsible minnow traps were set in slack water areas in 1996. The traps measured 10 x <br />10 x 17 inches with 1/16-inch mesh. Traps were anchored to shore in a position that allowed fish <br />access to openings on both ends of the net. Dry dog food was used as bait, and set times ranged <br />from approximately 1.5 to 17 hours. All fish captured were identified to species and enumerated. <br />A subsample offish was measured and all fish were released. Capture efficiency of minnow <br />traps was low and discharge was higher in 1997 than in 1996, which reduced the number of slack <br />water areas. Therefore, minnow traps were not used in 1997. <br />Light traps (Southern Concepts) were set in backwaters in 1996. These traps were 12.5 <br />inches high, 9.5 inches in diameter, and had 4 mm-wide openings. Traps were set overnight, and <br />all fish captured were preserved in alcohol so that they could be identified at a later date. Light <br />traps were not used in 1997 due to their poor efficiency in 1996 and the lack of backwater habitat <br />observed in 1997. <br />Fine-mesh drift nets were set in slow runs for periods ranging from 10 minutes up to <br />several hours. The length of time the nets were set depended on the amount of debris carried in <br />the water. All material collected in drift nets was preserved in alcohol and transported to the lab <br />for sorting and fish identification. <br />Fish Tagging <br />In an effort to collect information on the growth and movement of suckers, 561 <br />flannehnouth suckers and 94 bluehead suckers were tagged in 1997 with T-bar anchor tags or <br />fingerling tags (Floy Tag and Manufacturing, Inc.). Four of the tagged flannelmouth suckers <br />were recaptured on the same day as their initial capture, and 2 were caught the day after their <br />initial captwe. Four of these six fish were remeasured when they were recaptured. This limited <br />data set provided a way to check the precision of measurements of total length, standard length, <br />and weight, based on the assumption that the actual values for these parameters did not change <br />enough to be noticed in the short time between capture and recapture. <br />Radio tags were used to collect data on the movement of Colorado pikeminnow. Three <br />Colorado pikeminnow captured by boat electrofishing were implanted with radio transmitters <br />produced by Custom Telemetry and Consulting. These radio tags weighed 20 grams and had <br />internal coiled-loop antennas. Four other Colorado pikemi?mow (three caught with electrofishing <br />gear, one caught in a hoop net) were implanted with radio transmitters produced by Advanced <br />Telemetry Systems. These tags also had internal coiled-loop antennas, and weighed from 14.52 <br />to 20 grams. Transmitters were never implanted in fish unless the weight of the transmitter was <br />less than 2% of the individual's body weight. <br />Upon capture of a Colorado pikeminnow large enough to receive a radio transmitter, the <br />fish was anesthetized with tricaine methane sulfonate (Finquel brand of MS-222). The <br />transmitter was inserted in an incision made along the side of the fish in a position that was <br />anterior to the left pelvic fin. This location was used so that the transmitter would not rest upon <br />the incision. Fresh water was administered to the gills of the f sh during the operation. Alcohol <br />was used as a disinfection agent, and saline solution was used to remove residual alcohol from <br />the transmitters and prevent irritation of exposed tissue. After the transmitter was placed in the <br />body cavity, the incision was stitched with absorbable chromic gut sutures. No antibiotics were <br />5 <br />