Laserfiche WebLink
' 6/28/96 ... 2:44 PM <br />t <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />Camp Dresser £3 McKee Inc. <br />TABLE 3.1 <br />' Depletion Analysis (ac-ft) <br />Depletions to the Colorado River Below Ute Water Service Area <br />Scenario C -Year 2045 Demand <br />(Depletions if Replacement Reservoir Return Flows Not Credited to Ute) <br />Replacement of the Plateau Creek Pipeline <br /> Baseline' Future Total2 <br /> Depletions Depletions Future Net <br /> 1984 1987 Av 50-Year Demand De letions <br />:: <br />IVI1ll1JCl alt~mand :>i <br />6 945....`::... <br />28 5$;~ ...: <br />,21,&4 ~. . <br />- Municipal Diversions' 6,436 27,586 21,150 <br />- CU Diversions to Ute Water' 509 1,003 494 <br />CU Diversions by Agricultures 623 0 (623) <br />Jerry Creek Reservoirs Evaporation 670 661 (9) <br />Replacement Reservoir Releases <br />- Release to Ute Waters (667) (3,190) (2,524) <br />- Release to Agriculture' (33) 0 33 <br />Munici al Return Flowse 2,910 18,236 15,326 <br />Basin De letions 4,628 7,823 3,195 <br />' Average annual water usage prior to January 12, 1988; based on 1984-1987 average of finished water production. <br />In order to provide a firm yield under future demands from water currently held in the Ute Water portfolio, up to a maximum of 20.9 cfs <br />and an average of 5.3 cfs from Districts 95 cfs in Colorado River rights may be diverted. <br />' Portion of municipal demand supplied by diversion of non-CU water to WTP. <br />' Portion of municipal demand supplied by diversion of CU water to WTP; baseline and future CU water includes Mason & Eddy Ditch; <br />future depletions also include Coon Creek and Big Creek irrigation rights. <br />' Coon Creek and Big Creek irrigation rights historically diverted for agricultural use. <br />`Portion of municipal and CU diversions to District replaced by replacement reservoir (based on modeling of Districts rights). <br />' Portion of CU diversions to agriculture replaced by replacement reservoir (based on modeling of District's rights). <br />a Municipal return flows average 46.6% of annual use under 1986 system configuration and 71.8% of annual use under future demands, <br />based on analysis of District's system (see Tables 3.5 and 3.6). Note that return flows associated with replacement reservoir releases are <br />not included in the amounts shown. <br />' DEP_MOD2.XLS ... Table 3.1 (2) <br />