Laserfiche WebLink
dv <br />! CY <br />~~QV.1 ti \~ tI~ <br />Sportfishing Management, and Research, Monitoring, and Data Management (Rose N 2w~~~1 <br />and Hamill 1988). 1 <br />Provision of Instream Flows t <br />~5~~1~1~s~-~- ~,~,~ <br />Viable populations of Colorado River fishes must be,~maintained to allow <br />recovery to proceed. This can only be accomplished by providing habitat that <br />is suitable for them. Of first consideration is provision and maintenance of <br />instream flows of the proper quality, timing, duration, and magnitude. These <br />flows must be delivered to the proper locations to satisfy the life history <br />requirements of the various fishes. The attainment of sufficient quantities of <br />water requires determination of instream flow needs so that water can be <br />provided, acquired, or appropriated. However, flows needed for the fishes may <br />potentially affect water resources allocations among and between, the United <br />States, Mexico, and the states of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New -- <br />Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming. Because of this, flow recommendations must be <br />scientifically defensible if they are to be accepted by various agencies. <br />In the Green River, the operation of large reservoirs upstream of <br />endangered fish habitat can aid in providing needed instream flows. The Bureau <br />of Reclamation and the Fish and Wildlife Service have been cooperating in <br />studies designed to evaluate the impacts upon the endangered fishes associated <br />with operation of Flaming Gorge Dam. These studies, performed under <br />interagency agreements pursuant to Section 7 of the ESA have resulted in <br />recommendations for the operation of the dam to offset impacts on the fishes. <br />These include seasonal flow and non-flow related recommendations that have <br />been developed from analysis and interpretation of about 10 years of empirical <br />data (Tyus and Karp 1991). I ~hese recommendations wil_1_ be <br />implemented -or-i-£ further work is~eeded-.be-fir-e a ~ J~ <br />l ~• LOS ~ ~' ~ ~' <br />waa~d--be-cfra~ge~: ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~--~ ~ ~j~ ~~ gars t S o ~ z , -~u ~; n t~ ; S y c L ~s ~ K- ~° f ~~ ~~ <br />The appropriation, or acquisition of water rights is needed to provide a~~ <br />instream flows for recovery, and to offset impacts associated with continuing ~ 21~~z}"~ <br />water development. The first three areas that have been targeted for ~ <br />appropriating water include the Yampa River, a 15-mile reach of the Upper <br />Colorado River, and the White River. Flow recommendations '~~"'~"~ <br />' for endangered fishes in the Yampa and upper Colorado River --a..~~o ~ <br />were presented by Tyus and Karp(1989) and Kaeding and Osmundson (1989). T-hese- <br />r~ pp 11 j~ do~ooo A~ ~ w2~er ~t y¢~~`7 4'~e~~~\ ~ ~-~( <br />~~'T~bv... hv2dl F-~Se~vO~/ ~p• ~Q~-~~ ow YC~<o~rnJY.EH.~~io.rs ~v-~~t ~S- M11E- Y'QZC~Y- hW,~l-'~~G <br />Habitat Development and Maintenance <br />Development and maintenance of new habitats, and provision of access to / <br />new areas are considered a priority recovery goal by USFWS (1987). One <br />category includes the application of experimental techniques to existing areas ~ <br />to determine if artificially created habitats will be acceptable for use. , <br />This includes construction of artificial spawning channels, or conversion of <br />existing (but not currently suitable) stream areas to spawning habitats, <br />construction of nursery habitats, and others. Another category (e.g., <br />construction of fish passageways) would include opening up new areas, or <br />restoring access to other areas that may be blocked by dams, diversions, etc. <br />rl ~ C <br />c~v~- l ~ ~ ~ 1 a w Pc ~ <br />v~S 1'~,2V'n ` ~~?~~lA'~lo"~ ~C.Ye~ 5 S~r.rC~t--~ mkla~ W2 Qi Y~G~~S <br />~v,. Inc ~z~ d ~w~- ~~ h' J~ 5~tt~C~ Q~a,c~S A^rL c~r~'e~-~"1 / '~Qi.,- ~v2'`~~~'¢ <br />1 <br />