Laserfiche WebLink
reception of the radio signal in the field. Unfortunately, workers are con- <br />strained by equipment to only a few options. Any increase in received field <br />signal strength from transmitter to a receiving radio is dependent on power <br />output, efficiency of transmitting and receiving antennas, and the sensitivity <br />of the receiving system. The other factors affecting reception are principally <br />environmental and will be discussed in the case study. <br />The type and size of battery used with radiotransmitters is an important <br />consideration from the standpoint of size, weight, range, and life. For a <br />given application, battery weight and size is directly proportional to range <br />(power output) and the transmission life. Fish transmitters can be designed <br />to operate for hours to years with a given battery, but the range (signal <br />strength) decreases as transmitter life increases. Although range can be <br />increased by using a larger battery, the weight and size increase may not be <br />acceptable. If the theoretical longevity of a battery is obtained by dividing <br />the current demand (drain) of the transmitter (milliamps) into the battery <br />rated capacity (milliamp days), the resultant rating (life) of a radio module <br />(transmitter, antenna, and battery) provides a useful guide for module <br />selection. <br />Battery life is also dependent on pulse duration and pulse rate of a <br />transmitter, since these represent power output. The threshold sensitivity of <br />the human ear indicates that a reduction of a pulsed tone not be reduced less <br />than about 30 ms (Kolz and Johnson 1981), and tracking .is more difficult at <br />pulse rates less than about 30 per minute. Most investigators use a chrono- <br />graph (stopwatch) for determining pulse rates of transmitters; this method is <br />simple and the gear dependable for field use. Although sophisticated "pulse <br />interval timers" are available from industry, their high technology and <br />potential oversophistication may offer no advantage at higher cost. <br />Only a few types of transmitting antennas are suitable for monitoring <br />fish. The two main types are straight whip and tuned loop. Whip antennas are <br />generally small and omnidirectional. Although a whip antenna can be compressed <br />in length by shortening it from 0.5 to 0.25 wavelength, or by coiling part of <br />it, a loss in efficiency occurs. A decrease of the diameter of an antenna <br />also reduces efficiency. The required length of the whip a;~tenna is dependent <br />on the wavelength, and reducing the wavelength by raising the frequency will <br />allow greater efficiency for a given antenna size. Unfortunately, a frequency <br />increase lessens radio wave propagation through water; thus, the gain in <br />efficiency of antenna operation is less at higher frequencies. Use of a loop <br />(coiled) transmitting antenna or incorporation of the implant capsule as part <br />of a dipole antenna have proven desirable for surgically implanted modules <br />because of the necessity for compactness and the need to avoid protruding <br />antenr,s. I~ may be possible to increase the radiation resistance (antenna <br />efficiency) of some types of coiled antennas by increasing the length of the <br />coil. However, for a "tuned" inductor type or other sophisticated antenna <br />designs, the antenna may be part of a circuit, resonating at a certain mode. <br />The tuned induc'~r types of antennas, therefore, may not .be made more efficient <br />simply by increa::ing their lengths. <br />Transmitting antennas must radiate radio signals in all directions. <br />Receiving antennas should have a capability for receiving from all directions <br />140 <br />