Laserfiche WebLink
river that has high water conductivities, and turbidity precludes visual <br />observation. <br />RADIOTELEMETRY BACKGROUND AND THEORY <br />The use of radiotelemetry for obtaining physical microhabitat utilization <br />data on fishes is in its infancy (Tyus et al. 1984), and little guidance can <br />be obtained from published sources. Bovee (1986) summarized most of the <br />available information about radiotelemetry for the development of habitat <br />suitability criteria of stream fishes. This paper expands an earlier paper <br />(Tyus 1982) providing background information on radiotelemetry, updating <br />methods, and simplifying theory. <br />Radiotelemetry has been used to monitor movements and behavior of <br />terrestrial animals for many years. Earlier workers did not use radiotelemetry <br />for studying fish movement because it was believed that radiotransmission <br />through water would be too poor to be effective; they relied primarily on <br />ultrasonics (Stasko and Pincock 1977). There are, however, several dis- <br />advantages of ultrasonic tracking. For example, the detection of ultrasonic <br />signals requires that the receiving hydrophone be immersed in water. This <br />makes tracking difficult with ice cover and also eliminates the use of air- <br />craft. Ultrasonic telemetry is markedly influenced by water temperature, <br />turbulence, and sediment load. Temperature affects the velocity of ultrasonic <br />emissions, and, in deeper waters, a thermal discontinuity may reflect ultra- <br />sonic energy away from the hydrophone. Entrained air from waves, boat <br />propellers, and the movement of bottom sediments caused by stream currents may <br />cause enough noise to mask ultrasonic reception. For these reasons, radio- <br />telemetry has been the method most recently used for monitoring fish in large <br />river systems where visual observation is precluded by turbidity and <br />conductivities are moderate (Winters 1983). <br />Radiotelemetry uses a battery-powered radiotransmitter to generate radio <br />waves (electromagnetic radiation), which are propagated through the water. <br />This transmitted energy must then cross the air-water interface and be received <br />by an antenna operating in air. The propagation of radio waves through any <br />medium, in this case water, is inversely proportional to the frequency. Thus, <br />radio waves of high frequency travel a given distance with a greater loss of <br />power than an emission of lower frequency. The nature of the change in <br />propagation with frequency is approximately logarithmic (Lonsdale 1967; <br />Lonsdale and Baxter 1968). Radio signals are attenuated (diluted) more rapidly <br />in water than air, and the amount of attenuation is inversely proportional to <br />the conductivity of the water (Weeks et al. 1977). For this reason, a <br />considerable loss of signal strength is expected when radio waves are <br />propagated through fresh water of high conductivity. Radio transmission in <br />salt water is virtually impossible. <br />The behavior of radio energy at the air-water interface (Figure 1) is an <br />important consideration for radiotelemetry. Energy contacting the interface <br />is reflected unless the angle of incidence is less than 6° (Weeks et al. <br />1977). Radiation of the energy that passes this interface produces a signal, <br />138 <br />