My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1113
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
1113
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/24/2009 7:11:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
1113
Author
Tyus, H. M.
Title
Acquisition of Habitat Preference Data By Radiotelemetry, (Proceedings of a Workshop on the Development and Evaluation of Habitat Suitability Criteria).
USFW Year
1986.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~ __~ <br />.r ~ <br />U"~ ~"'-_ __________ <br />n ~~ <br />~~ <br />Figure 5. Illustration of depth ::nd mean water column transections at the <br />location of radiotagged Colorado squawfish. Depths drawn to scale; arrows <br />are vectors of velocity. <br />(Bovee 1986). This would require more data points across the stream (e.g., <br />perhaps at 1-m rather than 10-m increments) or more measurements near the <br />fish. <br />Water depths and velocities recorded at the observed locations of radio- <br />telemetered Colorado squawfish in the Green, Yampa, and White Rivers were <br />tested by ANOVA (Tyus et al. 1984) in an effort to evaluate potential <br />differences in microhabitats used. There was no significant difference in the <br />depths recorded from the Green River between 1980 and 1981, but a comparison <br />of the mainstem Green River with its tributaries indicated a significant <br />difference (P < 0.01) between depths recorded from the Green River fish and <br />fish using its two tributaries (White and Yampa Rivers). Depths recorded <br />between the White and Yampa Rivers were not significantly different. Although <br />an ANOVA indicated no significant differences between velocity readings for <br />Colorado squawfish using both methoc'~ in the Green River in 1980 and 1981, <br />velocity measurements by both methods were different (P < 0.01) between the <br />Green, White, and Yampa Rivers. It is not known if these differences are due <br />to the selection of different habitats or whether these comparisons reflect <br />different habitats present in these rivers. The results indicate that care <br />should be taken in lumping date until partitions between streams-can be made <br />and tested. <br />153 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.