My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1113
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
1113
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/24/2009 7:11:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
1113
Author
Tyus, H. M.
Title
Acquisition of Habitat Preference Data By Radiotelemetry, (Proceedings of a Workshop on the Development and Evaluation of Habitat Suitability Criteria).
USFW Year
1986.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
can be programmed to recognize frequencies and usually rotates through a <br />number of programed frequencies at a certain rate. Any major field study <br />should use receivers with search and track capabilities, especially if several <br />transmitters are used. A search model is greatly desired for fish tracking; <br />it-can prevent loss of a fish if temperature changes or other factors cause a <br />transmitter to emit a slightly different frequency. The search receiver, <br />however, cannot be tuned as precisely for individual transmitters as a pinpoint <br />receiver and cannot have as great a range in terms of signal strength received <br />or distance. Because radiotelemetry was developed principally for wildlife <br />applications, many tracking receivers are not tunable except for 10 or more <br />narrow frequency bands. Thesa should be avoided in fish tracking work in <br />favor of "search" and tunable "tracking" receiver types. Programmable <br />receivers require the exact frequency of the transmitter to be input as a <br />known. If temperature changes .cause the frequency to change very much (as is <br />often the case with small transmitters implanted in cold-blooded animals), the <br />receiver may not be able to detect the signal. Also, if the unit requires <br />much time to rotate through the frequencies one at a time, a fish location <br />could be overflown in aerial tracking. <br />CASE STUDY: RADIOTELEMETRY OF COLORADO SQUAWFISH <br />In March 1980, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service initiated a radio- <br />telemetry study of endangered fishes in the Green River as part of the Colorado <br />River Fisheries Project (Tyus and McAda 1984). The study area included the <br />Green River from Jensen, Utah, to its confluence with the Colorado River, <br />about 500 km downstream. Within this area, the river flows through long <br />stretches of flat water, enters whitewater in Desolation and Gray Canyons, and <br />passes through another flat water reach on its way to join the Colorado River. <br />The river has a relatively high conductivity (ranging from about 200 to <br />2,000 umho) and is full of underwater objects and obstructions. The river is <br />shallow (<10 ft) through most of the study area. <br />This case study evaluates radiotracking success in a large river, compares <br />habitat data based on radiotagged fish with data collected by electrofishing, <br />and discusses habitat data partitioning. The potential effects on the fish of <br />surgically implanted radios is evaluated by a comparison of growth rates <br />between implanted and nonimplanted fish. <br />METHODS <br />"Antenna-less" (transmitting antenna sealed within a coated capsule) <br />radio modules (AVM 1979) were obtained from the AVM and Smith-Root companies. <br />These radios consisted of a transmitting antenna, radiotransmitter, and <br />battery, all sealed in a water-tight capsule. Each had a magnetic switch and <br />was activated when implanted. Short-life and long-life radios were evaluated <br />from each company: <br />143 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.