Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Figure 1. Radio signals from a transmitter, passing through the <br />air water interface. <br />Only a small portion of this radiated power actually crosses the air water <br />interface and is available to the receiving system. However, if any "signif- <br />icant" energy breaks through the interface, radio reception can occur at long <br />ranges because of the rapid propagation of radio waves in air (Stasko and <br />Pincock 1977). <br />The type and size of battery used with radiotransmitters is an important <br />consideration from the standpoint of size, weight, range, and life. For a <br />given application, battery weight and size is directly proportional to range <br />(power output) and the transmission life. Fish transmitters can be designed <br />to operate for hours to years with a given battery, but the range decreases as <br />transmitter life increases. Although range can be increased by using a larger <br />battery, the weight and size increase may not be acceptable. The theoretical <br />longevity of a battery may be obtained by dividing the current demand (drain) <br />of the transmitter (milliamps) into the battery rated capacity (milliamp <br />days). Transmission lives and sizes of some batteries are provided in Tables 1 <br />and 2. <br />In review, radiotelemetry is a better tool for monitoring the movement of <br />fishes in certain aquatic environments, especially those in which use of <br />ultrasonics may be infeasible. Ultrasonics has great value in quiet water and <br />may be better for deep lakes, but radiotelemetry seems to be better for mon- <br />itoring fish movement in rapidly flowing rivers. As stated by Priede <br />(1980:110): "Radio signals.are not affected by air bubbles, water turbidity, <br />or obstructions... the way that sonic signals are." Also, ultrasonic signals <br />are not suitable for aerial. reception (e.g., by airplane) because the hydro- <br />phone must be immersed in water to receive the ultrasonic signals. Although <br />transmission through the air-water interface greatly reduces the apparent <br />signal strength of radio waves, reception in air is possible and the signal <br />strength is adequate for most applications. <br />Radiotelemetry in high conductivity waters is marginal (Sinning 1979), <br />and efforts must be taken to maximize the strength of the radio signal in the <br />field. Increases in received field signal strength from a transmitter to a <br />receiving radio is dependent on the efficiency of transmitting and receiving <br />antennas. Available transmitter designs represent the state-of-the-art techno- <br />logy, and lass of efficiency between transmitting and receiving antennas is <br />largely dependent on fish behavior and water conductivity. <br />RADIO TRANSMITTING ANTENNAS <br />On]y a few types of transmitting antennas are suitable for monitoring <br />fish movements. The two main types are straight whip and tuned loop. Whip <br />antennas are generally small and omnidirectional. Although a whip antenna can <br />be compressed in length by shortening it from 0.5 to 0.25 wavelength, or by <br />coiling part of it, a loss in efficiency occurs. A decrease of the diameter <br />is dependent on the wavelength, and reducing the wavelength by raising the <br />frequency will allow greater efficiency for a given antenna size. Unfor- <br />tunately, a frequency increase lessens the wave propagation through water; <br />