My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7979
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/24/2009 7:11:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7979
Author
Tyus, H. M.
Title
Fish Radiotelemetry
USFW Year
1982.
USFW - Doc Type
Theory And Application For High Conductivity Rivers.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the fish. Problems with transmitter size and transmission could have contrib- <br />uted to the loss of other fish. <br />Although Holden and Shelby (1978) encountered problems in their study, <br />their limited success 1n .using radiotelemetry in the Green River prompted <br />future investigations. <br />U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE FIELD STUDIES <br />Introduction <br />In March 1980, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service initiated a radio- <br />telemetry study of endangered fishes in the Green River in conjunction with <br />the Colorado River Fisheries Project (Miller et aT. 1981). Field operations <br />for the radiotelemetry study were directed from the FWS Field Station in <br />Vernal, Utah. More detailed information about this study is available in Tyus <br />et al. (1981). <br />It was evident from both a theoretical (Sinning 1979) and practical <br />standpoint (McAda and Wydoski 1980) that ultrasonic telemetry would not be <br />effective in monitoring movements of fishes in the Green River. However, the <br />limited success with radiotelemetry reported by Holden and Shelby (1978) <br />indicated that this technique might be effective. <br />Emphasis in this report is on radio reception from surgically implanted <br />transmitters in fishes in the natural environment, although some standardized <br />data obtained by immersing "naked" transmitters are reported. The study area <br />included the Green River from Jensen, Utah, to its confluence with the Colorado <br />River, over 482.7 km downstream. Within the area, the river flows through a <br />long stretch of whitewater in Desolation and Gray Canyons, has a relatively <br />high conductivity (ranging from about 200 to 1600 umho in 1980), and is full <br />of underwater objects and obstructions. The river, however, is quite shallow <br />through most of the study area, a factor that is important for success with <br />radiotelemetry. <br />Methods <br />FWS Colorado River Fishery Project personnel began testing radiotelemetry <br />equipment in the Green River in March, 1980. Field testing was done with AVM <br />and Smith-Root radio transmitters (fish modules) operating in the 40.660 to <br />40.700 MHz and 30.0 to 30.300 MHz range. The radio receivers were Smith-Root <br />search (SR-40) and standard tracking (RF-40) types. Larsen Kulrod NMO-40 whip <br />antennas and Smith-Root loop antennas were used. The field season ended in <br />September 1980 but limited testing was done as late as December to obtain <br />information on equipment performance in colder water (5° C). <br />After the project was initiated, only AVM fish modules (SM-i type) were <br />used for transmission. Transmission range was 40.660 to 40.700 MHz. The <br />module was powered by a mercury (Hg-630) battery and rated at a theoretical <br />life of 215 days, derived by dividing the battery capacity (14 milliamp-days) <br />by the expected current drain.(0.064 milliamps). The module weighed only <br />about 11 grams. Transmissions from the fish modules were pulsed at different <br />rates from about 60 to 90 counts per minute. <br />Radio transmitters were surgically implanted in the fish immediately <br />after capture. The fish were held in a 2.5 x 4 m ho}ding pert (Fig. 3) in the <br />Green River for one to two weeks after surgery The surgical procedure was <br />similar to Bidgood (1980) except that the incision was made on the lateral <br />aspect of the body wall, immediately anterior and dorsal to the insertion of <br />the right pelvic fin (Fig. 4), separate sutures were used, and knots were <br />coated with "Krazy glue". <br />Fish were located with the whip antenna mounted on a 20 cm2.piece of <br />0.5 cm thick flat steel plate, elevated about 4 m above the water surface on a <br />4 cm~ wooden post. All initial locating was done by boat or aircraft. Loop <br />antennas were used to triangulate fish positions at close range by boat and <br />from shore. <br />Aircraft were used throughout the study to locate fish. A Piper Super- <br />cub, operated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Animal Damage <br />Control, provided the best results because it could fly slowly at a low alti- <br />tude (100 km/h speed at 105 m altitude). The use of another airplane, flying <br />at about 150 kph, provided poor results. Two nmo-40 whip antennas were <br />attached to wing struts on the airplane and two receivers (a search and pin- <br />point type) were used with headphones. <br />Water conductivities (umho/cm) were measured with a Yellow Springs Model <br />33 Meter (not temperature compensated). Two meters were often tested together <br />to make sure they were operating correctly. Temperature readings from the <br />conductivity meter were verified by a handheld thermometer. Following the <br />American Public Health Association's (1971) Standard Methods text, conduc- <br />tivity readings were converted to the standard equivalent value at 25° C. <br />Six Colorado squawfish (TL 508 to 707 mm) and one razorback sucker <br />(TL 510 mm) were captured in April and May, surgically implanted with AVM fish <br />modules (SM-1) (Figs. 5 and 6), and released. These fish were tracked by <br />different methods until September, the conclusion of the 1980 study. <br />On December 18, 1980, two AVM transmitters (SM-i), one having a mercury <br />and one a lithium battery, and one Smith-Root small fish module were tested fn <br />the study area at different depths. A]] transmitters pulsed the signal at <br />about 60 counts-per-minute. Water conductivity was 480 pmho (770 umho <br />corrected to 25° C) and water temperatue was 5° C. All transmitters worked <br />satisfactorily. One transmitter (AVM No. 17010), which had earlier been <br />retrieved from Colorado squawfish No. 001, had been refrigerated. Receiving <br />antennas were about 4 m above the water surface. <br />16 i 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.