Laserfiche WebLink
<br />zooplankton and benthic organisms, and postlarvae as small as 30 mm have been <br />observed consuming other fish (Muth and Snyder 1995). <br />Late summer and autumn is a critical period for growth and survival of young Colorado <br />~ pikeminnow. The abundance and growth of young pikeminnow in the Green River are <br />favored by relatively low flows, and impaired by high flows that inundate and damage <br />backwater habitat: catch and growth rates during late summer and autumn were higher <br />in the low flow years (1979-1980) and lowest in years with unusually high releases <br />(1983-1984) from Flaming Gorge Dam (Tyus et al. 1987). This relationship suggests <br />~ that the flows that optimize growth and survival of small pikeminnow vary with time of <br />year and that postlarval survival depends on the availability of backwater nursery <br />habitat (Tyus and Haines 1991). <br />Most larvae produced by one population will use one nursery area downstream (Figure <br />~ 3). Larvae produce in the Grand Valley region of the UCR drift downstream to a <br />nurcery area in the vicinity of Moab, UT (Valdez et al. 1982). In the Green River, there <br />are two nursery areas; one is 130-150 km downstream from the Yampa River spawning <br />reach, and the other is 130-150 km downstream of the Green River spawning reach <br />(Tyus et al 1982b and 1987, Tyus and Haines 1991). The nursery habitat is created <br />~ with the gradually decreasing flows that follow spring runoff and persists through the <br />summer and early autumn. Increased releases from reservoirs in autumn and winter <br />may inundate this habitat. The quantity and quality of these habitats are thought to be <br />crucial to successful recruitment. <br />. Aerial photography and videography have been used to assess the relationship <br />between nursery habitat condoions and flow in the river. In the Green River, aerial <br />studies coupled with ground interpretation have shown that maximum area of <br />backwaters occurs at flows in the range of 30 to 50 m3/s (Pucherelli and Clark 1989). <br />Flows above or below this level reduce the number of backwaters available as nursery <br />habitat. However, it is clear that a simple flow vs. backwater area relationship does not <br />~ exist. Instead, the area and number of backwaters depends on a complex relationship <br />that is sensitive to the timing, duration, and magnitude of flow and sediment inputs, as <br />well as the physical characteristics of the riverine habitat. Other studies of the <br />relationship between backwater habitat and flow are being conducted by the Bureau of <br />Reclamation and the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources for the UCR (Fenton 1996), <br />~ but results are not yet available. <br />Nutrient dynamics in the backwater nursery habitats have not been studied thoroughly, <br />but some studies have been done in the Green River. Backwaters in the Ouray area, <br />where larval pikeminnow were abundant, were richer in food than similar habitat <br />~ upstream. Reduced fluctuations in water level near Ouray may have resulted in more <br />stable backwater habitats and possibly reduced exported nutrients and food (Grabowski <br />and Hiebert 1989). <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />