Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Migration and Spawninp_. The initiation of spawning migration is an important event in <br />the reproductive cycle of the Colorado pikeminnow. Because most home ranges are <br />upstream of spawning areas, migrations usually begin in the downstream direction, but <br />~ upstream migrations also occur (Tyus et al. 1987, Tyus 1990, Irving and Modde 1995). <br />In fact, the longest migration on record occurred when a fish tagged in Lake Powell <br />moved 318 km upstream in about one month to join an aggregation of other fish in the <br />UCR. Based on radio tracking data, fish in the Green River begin spawning migrations <br />about June 21 (range: May 23'~ to July 22"x) and fish in the Yampa River migrate about <br />June 15 (range: May 27"' to July 13"' ). The timing of migrations in the UCR and the <br />San Juan River is similar to that reported for the Green River, occurring from late June <br />through early August (Archer et al. 1985, Ryden and Ahlm 1996). <br />Spawning migrations begin just after peak runoff and are initiated earlier in low water <br />years than in high water years (Tyus and Karp 1989). The time between the date of <br />~ peak runoff and the initiation of migration is negatively con-elated with the date of peak <br />flow; in the Green and Yampa rivers, there were statistically significant correlations in <br />which earlier dates of peak flows were associated with longer time intervals before the <br />migration occurred (Tyus 1990). The potential importance of flow is highlighted by the <br />recent hypothesis that flow spikes from spring rainstorms may influence ovulation and <br />~ spawning (Nester et al. 1988). Temperature may also influence the timing of migration <br />because temperatures must be at least 9°C (average 14°C) before migration occurs. <br />The annual pattem of spawning migrations of Colorado pikeminnow in the Green River <br />basin demonstrates a clear capacity for homing to particular sites (Tyus 1985, 1990). <br />~ The precise mechanism by which adults locate these sites is not understood fully, but <br />circumstantial evidence supports natal imprinting (Wick et al. 1983, Tyus 1990). <br />Electron microscopy has revealed that larvae possess a functional olfactory mechanism <br />(R. Muth, personal communication). Not only are the receptors present, but a burst of <br />hormones in the early larval stage suggests that imprinting is occurring (Scholz et al. <br />i 1993). Furthermore, recent studies with adult fish that have been exposed to hormones <br />have shown an extremely acute sense of smell (A. Scholz, personal communication). <br />The pattem of movement of adults in the Green River basin is too complex to be <br />explained as a response to gradients in environmental variables or to odors from <br />conspecifics. Individual fish may travel long distances to spawning grounds, and fish <br />~ with adjacent home ranges may go to different spawning reaches that are separated by <br />many miles. Each fish appears to use only one spawning area (Wick et al. 1983; Tyus <br />1985, 1990; Irving and Modde 1995), but fish migrating to one location may pass <br />through another one. Moreover, before fish begin these migrations, they are dispersed <br />widely in the Green, White, and Yampa rivers, and may be upstream or downstream of <br />~ their destinations. <br />It is possible that Colorado pikeminnow migrate to and spawn in locations where they <br />were hatched (i.e., homing to natal areas), however this has never been proven. <br />Orientation to olfactory cues provides an explanation consistent with the observed <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />