Laserfiche WebLink
Shallow backwaters with a large surface area in the Ouray area that were <br />seasonally permanent after runoff subsided were generally warmer compared to <br />upstream backwaters at Island Park and Jensen; they had higher concentrations <br />of nutrients, particulate organic material, and greater densities and weights <br />of benthic macroinvertebrates, and moderate chlorophyll a levels. Benthic <br />macroinvertebrates were the principal food source for most young fish, except <br />suckers. The river is one nutrient source for backwaters. Increased <br />concentrations of some nutrients in the river at Ouray compared to Jensen, <br />result from upstream agricultural runoff and return flows (abstracted from <br />Executive Summary). <br />Study 6: Mapping of Important Backwater Habitats of Colorado squawfish. <br />Report 18- Comprehensive Report (1986-1988) on the Effects of Green River <br />Flows on Backwater Habitat Availability as Determined by Remote Sensing <br />Techniques (Pucherelli and Clark 1989). <br />Aerial photography and videography can be used successfully to determine <br />backwater availability in the upper Colorado river basin in response to <br />varying flow regimes. These techniques should also be applied to future <br />riverine habitat monitoring programs for the Green and Colorado rivers. A flow <br />range of 28.3 to 50.94 m /s at the USGS Jensen gauge will produce more <br />backwater area and numbers on the upper Green River. Flows above 50.94 m3/s <br />had a detrimental effect on backwater development under our study conditions. <br />A gradually decreasing hydrograph during summer months appears to be a <br />required condition for maximizing backwater availability. High flows may be <br />required before young-of-the-year Colorado squawfish enter the system to <br />maximize backwater availability. Backwaters are much more numerous and <br />substantially larger in the Green River above Desolation Canyon than below it. <br />The upper nursery area (Tyus et al. 1987) had the greatest amount of backwater <br />habitat (Conclusions). <br />PART III. HABITAT USE AND STREAMFLOW NEEDS OF COLORADO SQUAWFISH, HUMPBACK <br />CHUB, AND RAZORBACK SUCKER <br />The following section summarizes habitat use and streamflow need <br />information for Colorado squawfish, bonytail chub, humpback chub, and <br />razorback sucker in the Green River. Habitat requirements and factors limiting <br />the distribution and abundance of each species were obtained from data <br />presented in the preceding section and from a review of pertinent literature. <br />Colorado squawfish <br />Adult <br />Adult Colorado squawfish are widely distributed in the Yampa and Green <br />rivers, where the fish is considered most abundant (Holden and Stalnaker 1975, <br />Tyus et al. 1982ab, Behnke and Benson 1983, Tyus 1990}. In the mainstream <br />Green River, adults were most prevalent in upper and lower sections (Tyus et <br />al. 1987). <br />During the winter months, adult Colorado squawfish used backwaters <br />(ephemeral along-shore embayments), runs, and eddies, but were most common, <br />and presumably feeding, in shallow shoreline areas and "slackwaters" (Valdez <br />and Masslich 1989, Wick and Hawkins 1989). Colorado squawfish selected certain <br />river reaches in the Green and upper Yampa rivers and generally remained <br />active in these areas all winter (Valdez and Masslich 1989, Wick and Hawkins <br />15 <br />