Laserfiche WebLink
which pose a serious threat to the razorback sucker, are present in all 15 reaches of <br />critical habitat. Also included are areas in which critical habitat for the razorback sucker <br />overlaps with that of other listed species (after Maddux et al. 1993, USFWS 1994): <br />RZ1: Yampa River section from Cross Mountain Canyon to Green River. <br />The lower reaches of the Yampa River provide adult and spawning habitat, and <br />potential nursery areas occur downstream. The existing water quantity and <br />quality conditions are relatively unaltered from historic conditions. Tyus and <br />Karp (1989) found the existing flows in this reach adequate for life history needs <br />of the native fishes, principally because spring flows and baseline conditions are <br />little changed from historic conditions. The primary threat to razorback sucker <br />survival and recruitment in this reach is the abundance of nonnative fish species <br />that prey upon or may compete with the razorback sucker, and the State of <br />Colorado has removed bag and possession limits for predaceous warmwater <br />game fish within critical habitat. Protection of the Yampa River will maintain its <br />contribution of flow and nutrients to important downriver reaches (RZ2 and RZ3) <br />on the Green River (McAda and Wydoski 1980; Tyus and Karp 1989). <br />RZ2: Green River section from mouth of Yampa River to Sand Wash. <br />This reach of the Green River contains the largest existing riverine population of <br />the razorback sucker (Lanigan and Tyus 1989, Modde et al. 1996). The reach <br />provides spawning (Tyus and Karp 1990) and nursery habitat (Wick et al. 1982). <br />Flaming Gorge dam prevents upstream movement and, in combination with the <br />Fontenelle dam, alters water flows, temperature regimes, and sediment, and <br />contaminant concentrations. The dams are presently providing some flows <br />needed by the endangered fishes, and the Service and the Bureau of <br />Reclamation are studying this reach for determining water flow needs of the fish. <br />However, Stephens et al. (1992) found sufficient levels of boron, selenium, and <br />zinc in water, sediment, and fish tiss~le samples to be harmful to fish in some <br />restricted locations. Selenium levels from one impounded area are elevated and <br />28 <br />