Laserfiche WebLink
Green River hydrograph below the confluence of the Yampa River is maintained <br />to some degree by spring runoff from the Yampa River (Figure 3). <br />Flows of the Green River increased historically in March due to spring <br />snowmelt and remained high through July (Figu~e 3). Mean monthly flow during <br />spring runoff (April-July) was about 401.86 m /s {period of record 1895-1962, <br />USGS at G~een River, Utah). A maximum flow of 1,927.23 m3/s and a minimum flow <br />of 7.22 m /s were recorded at Green River, Utah in 1917 and 1931, respectively <br />{Ugland et al. 1987). Following spring runoff, flows of the G~een River <br />declined toward an average-monthly base flow of about 64.81 m /s for <br />September through February (USGS flow records), and large daily fluctuations <br />in river level were infrequent events. Closure of Flaming Gorge Dam in 1963 <br />greatly altered this historic flow regimen. Daily operation of the dam from <br />1967 to 1984 has been based on peaking power demand, and the resultant annual <br />hydrograph in the upper Green River (above its confluence with the Yampa <br />River) is relatively flat, with extreme daily fluctuations {Figure 3). Spring <br />peaks below the Dam are non-existent during most years, and winter baseflows <br />at Green River, Utah have increased substantially (from about 79.24 to 107.54 <br />m /s, 1967-1984, USGS at Green River, Utah). <br />Native fishes of the Green River basin evolved in a system of <br />fluctuating seasonal and annual flows characterized by wet, average, and dry <br />climatic periods. We consider the recurring cycle of high spring flows <br />followed by a period of lower flows (as indicated by the flow regimen of Yampa <br />River in Figure 3) the "natural, or current flow regimen". This regimen is <br />typified by a hydrologic pattern of high spring and low autumn-winter flows <br />that vary in magnitude and duration depending on annual precipitation and <br />runoff from snowmelt. <br />Colorado River Fishes <br />Fishes indigenous to the Green River basin include cyprinids {Colorado <br />squawfish, humpback chub, bonytail chub Gila el~ans, roundtail chub G. <br />robusta, speckled dace Rhinichthvs osculus, and Kendall Warm Springs dace <br />Rhinichthvs o. thermalis), catostomids {razorback sucker, fianne]mouth sucker <br />Catostomus latipinnis, bluehead sucker C. discobolus, mountain sucker C. <br />platyrhynchus), salmonids (Colorado River cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarki <br />pleuriticus; Rocky Mountain whitefish Prosopium williamsoni), and sculpins <br />(Cottus species; Tyus et ai. 1982a; Sehnke and Benson 1983; Woodiing 1985). <br />All mainstream fishes persist today despite the introduction of numerous non-. <br />native fishes of which about 20 species are common in the Green River basin <br />(Tyus et al. 1982a; Wick et al. 1985; USFWS, unpublished data). Rare fishes <br />usually occur in greatest numbers in unaltered or natural river systems (e.g., <br />Yampa River, Little Colorado River) which is presumably associated with <br />maintenance of usable fish habitat due to a regimen of fluctuating seasonal <br />and annual flows. <br />The native cyprinids and catostomids were widely distributed in <br />mainstream habitats and dominated the fish fauna of the historic Colorado <br />River basin (Jordan and Evermann 1896). However, four of these fishes, the <br />Colorado squawfish, razorback sucker, humpback chub, and bonytail-chub, are <br />now threatened with extinction presumably due to the combined effects of <br />habitat .loss {including regulation of natural flow, temperature, and sediment <br />regimes); proliferation of introduced fishes; and other man-induced„ <br />disturbances (Miller 1961; Hinckley 1973; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />1987a). The Colarado~squawfish, humpback chub, and bonytail chub are federally <br />