Laserfiche WebLink
PART I: FLAMING GORGE STUDIES <br />Introduction <br />The Bureau of Reclamation (BR) and the Fish and 4lildlife Service (FWS) <br />have been in consultation on various 8R projects in the Colorado River basin <br />under provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. The <br />operation of Flaming Gorge Dam has long been of concern because early <br />investigators stated that construction and operation of the Dam adversely <br />impacted native fishes in the Green River (e.g., Vanicek et ai. 1970; Holden <br />and Stalnaker 1975). More recent investigations have demonstrated that timing <br />and magnitude of water releases were critical to the maintenance and recovery <br />of some endangered fishes (Tyus et al. 1987). <br />Information on habitat use and streamf]ow needs of the endangered fishes <br />and on potential effects of widespread introductions of non-native fishes, is <br />essential for FWS to prepare a Biological Opinion under Section 7 of the <br />Endangered Species Act. Lack of such information resulted in the establishment <br />of the Colorado River Fishes Project by FWS in the late 1970's. The objectives <br />of this project, funded principally by BR and staffed by FWS biologists, <br />included collection of life history information on the Colorado squawfish <br />Ptychocheilus Lucius, and humpback chub Gila cypha in the Green River. Data <br />.were also collected on the razorback sucker Xyrauchen texanus, a candidate <br />species for federal protection under the Act, and protected by all states <br />where extant populations exist. <br />This report summarizes findings of several initiatives designed by FWS <br />and BR to evaluate habitat use and flow needs of endangered fishes in the <br />Green River basin. Part I describes the environmental setting, and presents <br />findings of each initiative. Part II summarizes and consolidates available <br />information on each species, and Part Iii summarizes flow needs for use in the <br />preparation of a biological opinion on the operation of Flaming Gorge Dam. <br />Detailed scopes of work pertaining to the individual investigations were <br />presented in modifications to the Interagency Agreement between BR and FWS <br />(FWS 14-16-006-86-953R) dated 9 June 1986. Most studies were conducted by <br />FWS, however, two studies were performed by BR with assistance from FWS, and <br />two studies were conducted by private contractors. These studies included <br />continuation of ongoing projects (including evaluation of spring, summer, and <br />fall requirements of Colorado squawfish) and new research initiatives <br />(including evaluation of spring and early summer habitat use of razorback <br />sucker and humpback chub, potential effects of introduced fishes on Colorado <br />squawfish and humpback chub, winter flow needs of Colorado squawfish and <br />razorback sucker, effects of low summer/fall flows on young Colorado <br />squawfish).-This report consolidates all studies and presents flow <br />recommendations derived from them in partial fulfillment of the Interagency <br />Agreement. <br />Environmental Setting <br />Legal agreements in 1928 (Carlson and Carlson 1982) separated the <br />Colorado River into upper and lower basins near Lee Ferry, Arizona. More <br />recently, the upper basin was sub-divided into three hydrologic sub-basins: <br />Green, Upper Main-Stem, and San Juan-Color~do (Iornes et al. 965). The Green <br />River sub-basin comprises about 116,000 km of the 284,000 km occupied by the <br />upper Colorado River basin (see Appendix for conversion to English system). <br />3 <br />