Laserfiche WebLink
based on criteria associated with operational costs and recovery potential. <br />Razorback sucker <br />Razorback sucker work would include an evaluation of existing stocks, but <br />more emphasis would be placed on artificial imprinting as a stop-gap measure. <br />Emphasis would be placed on stock evaluation and use of hatchery facilities to <br />a greater extent than in the Colorado squawfish. <br />The Ouray experimental hatchery facility in Utah has been given a high <br />priority for razorback sucker work because of its proximity to a large <br />population of spawning adults and potential recovery areas, staff experience <br />with propagation of the fish, and reduced costs associated with using an <br />existing facility. Releases of imprinted fish into the Green River would <br />ostensibly provide the-best existing habitat to insure high r~urns. However, <br />the importance of this work dictates that more than one site be used if <br />possible, and results compared. This study is..restricted to the Upper Colorado <br />River Basin, and it is noted that state regulations may not allow work on the <br />endangered fishes outside the basin. <br />WORK ITEMS: <br />Genetic Assessment <br />-~ <br />Recent studies indicate that some Colorado squawfish and razorback suckers <br />in the Green and Yampa rivers return to the same spawning sites for spawning <br />(Wick et al 1983, 198b; Tyus 1985, in press; Tyus and Karp, In press). If <br />return to these specific spawning sites is a general reproductive phenomenon <br />for these species (i.e., the fish return to natal spawning areas as adults and <br />spawn in the reach(a) or exact site(b) at which they were hatched), then <br />genetic differentiation among disjunct spawning populations or stocks is <br />suspected. The existence of genetically-distinct populations of Colorado _ <br />squawfish and razorback suckers should be evaluated for these different <br />spawning areas could be evaluated by collecting and analyzing genetics data <br />In addition, there may be a genetic basis for sub-stocks within a spawning <br />area; in squawfish, the different rheotaxes (positive and negative) noted in <br />migrating fish suggest the existence of these sub-stocks. ,These different <br />movement patterns must also be considered in testing the following hypotheses: <br />Hl:Breeding populations of Colorado squawfish and razorback suckers are <br />genetically differentiated. <br />Tasks: Determine if Colorado squawfish and razorback sucker are ~y~T 4.--•--~•~ <br />reproductively isolated between (a) reaches or (b) spawning sites: <br />Methods: Identify spawning sites in the upper Colorado River Basin. At each <br />site during the spawning season, capture fish in breeding condition and mark <br />them with a uniquely-numbered tag. Take superficial somatic tissues and <br />gametes from each fish for genetic analyses. If possible, obtain tissues and <br />sex products of fish known to use reaches(a) and sites(b) for spawning, or of <br />fish emerging from such areas. Perform analyses (i.e. allozymes and mtDNA) to <br />