My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6027
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
6027
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/24/2009 7:09:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
6027
Author
Tyus, H. M., R. L. Jones and L. A. Trinca.
Title
Green River Rare and Endangered Fish Studies, 1982-85
USFW Year
1987.
USFW - Doc Type
Final Report.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The radiotelemetry program utilized two different methods for recording <br />information about habitat preferences and movement. The first method recorded <br />long distance movement by attempting to locate all radiotagged fish at weekly <br />intervals. The location of a fish was recorded as a single contact when <br />encountered. The second method, used only in 1981, utilized a diel sampling <br />schedule to obtain more specific information on local movement and habitat <br />preferences. This sampling procedure consisted of observations made <br />continuously on a 24-hour basis as follows: <br />1. Fish to be studied were selected by tag number from a table of <br />random digits. <br />2. The day was divided into three eight-hour periods and one was <br />selected at random. A fish was then observed continuously during <br />this period. If a fish remained stationary for 30 min, then water <br />depth, water velocity and substrate determinations were made at 15 <br />min intervals. <br />3. After a fish had been monitored for three, eight hour periods, the <br />fish with the next tag number was then selected for study. <br />The location of each radiotelemetered fish was carefully fixed and <br />recorded. General location was recorded in river miles (RM) upstream of the <br />mouth of each river, as given in Belknap and Belknap (1974) and Evans and <br />Belknap (1973), and later converted into river kilometers (RK). If the fish <br />remained in one location for 30 min, it was assumed this habitat was preferred <br />and microhabitat information was recorded. Microhabitat information included <br />general habitat, substrate type, water depth and water velocity (Table 1). <br />Water depth, average velocity, and substrate measurements were taken only after <br />the fish moved to another location or at the end of the study period in order <br />to minimize stress. Water depth was recorded by direct measurement with a <br />wading rod and average water velocity was measured at 7.6 depth (measured from <br />14 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.