Laserfiche WebLink
Colorado squawfish vary with time of year, and that both <br />reproduction and recruitment to the juvenile stage are <br />highest in years when hydrographs approximate natural <br />flow conditions. This presumably is related to the <br />availability of nursery backwater habitat in fall. <br />Aerial photography was used to evaluate the effect of <br />seven test flows on availability of backwater habitat in late <br />summer and fa111987 at four sites (Island Park, Jensen, <br />Ouray, Sand Wash) in the upper Green River (M. <br />Pucherelli and R. Clark, written communication). It was <br />found that the greatest amount of backwater habitat <br />resulted when flows ranged from 31.15 to 50.17 m3/s, and <br />the least amount of backwater habitat was present at flows <br />of 68.57 and 148.85 m3/s. Averaging the Jensen, Ouray, <br />and Sand Wash sites (i.e., the upper Green River <br />concentration area for young Colorado squawfish drifting <br />out of the Yampa River), area of backwater habitat was <br />greatest with flows of 50.17 and 47.74 m3/s, and number <br />of backwater habitats was maximized at 47.74 m3/s. These <br />relations support the biological information and <br />emphasize that young Colorado squawfish need low flows <br />in late summer and fall. <br />Juvenile <br />Factors limiting the distribution and abundance of <br />juvenile Colorado squawfish are difficult to assess <br />because there is little information available regarding <br />their habitat requirements. Stream blockage is viewed <br />as limiting because upstream movement of juveniles is <br />necessary to maintain adult populations. <br />Evidence of predation by nonnative fishes in both <br />artificial and natural environments suggests that this <br />factor limits the survival of juvenile Colorado squawfish. <br />Hendrickson and Brooks (1987) noted predation by <br />yellow bullhead (Ictalunis rratalis) and largemouth bass <br />(Micropterus salmoides) on young Colorado squawfish <br />stocked into the Verde River, Arizona. Osmundson <br />(1987) noted predation by largemouth bass, green <br />sunfish, black crappie (Pomoris -iigromaculatres), and <br />black bullhead (Ictalunrs melas) on young Colorado <br />squawfish in gravel pits near the Colorado River, <br />Colorado, and indicated that predation by channel <br />catfish may also have occurred. In addition, Coon <br />(1965) reported channel catfish predation on Colorado <br />squawfish in the Dolores River. Flow regimens and <br />other conditions that may aid the proliferation of these <br />nonnative predators must be identified and, if possible, <br />avoided. <br />Humpback Chub <br />Spring peak flows are important to reproductive <br />success of the humpback chub, because spawning <br />occurs in shoreline eddy habitat shortly after this period. <br />Availability of these habitats is greatest during spring <br />runoff and lessens thereafter with decreasing summer <br />flows (Karp and Tyus 1989). Loss or reduction of spring <br />runoff could reduce availability of spawning habitat and <br />thus adversely affect humpback chub reproduction. <br />Habitat alteration may also promote hybridization with <br />other species (Valdez and Clemmer 1982). Flow <br />reductions- and decreased temperatures have been <br />implicated as factors curtailing successful spawn and <br />increasing competition in the Colorado River (Kaeding <br />and Zimmerman 1983). <br />Humpback chubs and channel catfish may be <br />competing for food or quality microhabitat as suggested <br />by capture of both species with baits in the same eddy <br />habitats in the Yampa River (Tyus and Minckley 1988; <br />Karp and Tyus 1989). The high number of channel <br />catfish in preferred humpback chub spawning habitat <br />(30% of the catch in 1987 and 1988; Karp and Tyus 1989) <br />suggests that this omnivorous introduced species may <br />adversely affect reproductive success of the humpback <br />chub in the Yampa Canyon. In addition, the presence of <br />bite marks on humpback and roundtail chubs may be <br />due to attempted predation by channel catfish (Kaeding <br />and Zimmerman 1983; Karp and Tyus 1989; C. O. <br />Minckley, personal communication). W. L. Minckley <br />(personal communication) also noted humpback chub <br />remains in stomachs of channel catfish captured in the <br />Little Colorado River. Flows or other conditions (e.g., <br />temperature; Tyus and Nikirk, in review) which may <br />favor growth of channel catfish in the Green River basin <br />should be determined and avoided. <br />Humpback chubs predominantly use canyon habitat <br />(Fig. 4) and availability of such habitat could be <br />adversely affected by alteration of the natural flow cycle <br />of the Yampa River (Fig. 1). <br />Bonytail Chub <br />Bonytail chubs were never reported as abundant in <br />the Yampa River and a decline is not indicated in that <br />system. However, in the Echo Park area, bonytail chubs <br />have apparently declined, possibly due to flow and <br />temperature changes resulting from closure of Flaming <br />Gorge Dam. A similar pattern has been noted in the <br />Colorado River downstream from Glen Canyon Dam <br />(Utah State Department of Fish and Game 1964,1969). <br />Although the preimpoundment poisoning of riverine <br />habitat in the upper Green River in 1962 has been <br />implicated in the decline of the bonytail chub in that <br />system, fish collections in DNM before and after the <br />poisoning (Binns et a1.1963; Vanicek and Kramer 1969; <br />Vanicek et al. 1970) suggested that the downstream <br />extent of the poison was not a factor in the almost total <br />extirpation of the species from the Echo Park area. <br />Current negotiations between the Fish and Wildlife <br />Service and Bureau of Reclamation regarding <br />management of Flaming Gorge Dam operations for rare <br />fishes may improve the future of the bonytail chub in the <br />21 <br />