Laserfiche WebLink
for dispersal from upstream spawning grounds to <br />downstream nursery habitats (Tyus and McAda 1984; <br />Tyus 1986; Paulin et al., in review). These productive <br />nursery habitats are created during summer by <br />gradually decreasing flows following spring runoff. <br />Postlarval (young-of-the-year) Colorado squawfish are <br />rare in the Yampa River, the farthest upstream record <br />of postlarval Colorado squawfish in the Yampa River is <br />RK 24 (Haynes et al. 1984). <br />Juvenile <br />Distribution, abundance, and habitat use of juvenile <br />Colorado squawfish (60-450 mm total length) in the <br />Yampa River are poorly understood because of the <br />rarity of this life history stage (Miller et al. 1982; Wick <br />et a1.1983,1985). From 1980 to 1988, only 3% (N = 198) <br />of all Colorado squawfish greater than 60 mm collected <br />by Service biologists in the Yampa River were juveniles. <br />The downstream drift of larvae from Yampa River <br />spawning grounds suggests that along-distance <br />upstream movement by juveniles is needed to <br />repopulate upstream areas (Tyus 1986). Such <br />movement probably occurs during the late juvenile or <br />early adult stage, because only large-sized fish are found <br />in the upper Yampa River. This phenomenon is also <br />supported by data from the Green River showing large <br />concentrations of larger juvenile Colorado squawfish <br />(average electrofishing catch, > 0.18 fish per hour) in <br />the lower section of the mainstream Green River and <br />greatest concentrations of adults (average <br />electrofishing catch, > 0.6 fish per hour) in upstream <br />sections (Tyus et al. 1987). <br />Humpback Chub <br />Adult <br />Adult humpback chubs (> 230 mm) were captured <br />in canyon-bound habitat in the lower 89.6 km of the <br />Yampa River (Tyus et a1.1982a; Karp and Tyus 1989; C. <br />Haynes, personal communication) and in the lower <br />16 km of the Little Snake River (E. Wick, personal <br />communication; Fig. 4). Service biologists captured <br />seven adult humpback chubs in the Yampa River <br />(RK 28.8-75.2) from 1981 to 1985. From 1986 to 1988, <br />expanded efforts between RK 6.4 and 73.6 yielded <br />88 captures (9 recaptures). Adult humpback chubs <br />were most often collected in eddy habitat (average <br />depth, 2 m), particularly in shoreline eddies created by <br />large boulders and rapids (Karp and Tyus 1989). Adult <br />humpback chub were commonly captured with <br />roundtail chub and the introduced channel catfish <br />(Ictaktnts puiictatus; Karp and Tyus 1989). <br />Classification of the adult life history stage was based on <br />the smallest ripe humpback chub captured, a 232-mm <br />male in Whirlpool Canyon, Green River. <br />Spawning <br />Spawning of the humpback chub in Yampa Canyon <br />was documented in 1986 with the capture of two spent <br />females and two ripe males (Tyus et al. 1987). This was <br />confirmed in 1987 with the capture of 2 ripe females, <br />7 ripe males, and 11 tuberculated fish (sex not <br />determined, 2 recaptures); and in 1988 with the capture <br />of 1 ripe female, 5 ripe males, and 2 tuberculated fish <br />(1 1987 recapture; Karp and Tyus 1989). Thus, a total <br />of 32 mature humpback chubs (3 recaptures) were <br />captured in spawning condition in Yampa Canyon, <br />RK 19.2-64, in shoreline eddy and run habitat (Fig. 4). <br />Humpback chubs spawn shortly after peak spring flows <br />(Fig. 13; 1986 not included because sampling was <br />initiated following highest spring flows). This relation <br />has also been noted in the Blackrocks area of the upper <br />Colorado River (Valdez and Clemmer 1982; Archer et <br />al. 1985) and in the Little Colorado River, Arizona <br />(Kaeding and Zimmerman 1983; C. O. Minckley, <br />personal communication). <br />Although specific discrimination of Colorado River <br />Gila is problematical in some areas (Holden and <br />Stalnaker 1970; Valdez and Clemmer 1982), chubs <br />captured in the Yampa River in 1987 and 1988 were <br />226 <br />zoo <br />ne <br />1so <br />E <br />,,, 128 <br />c~ <br />g 100 <br />a ~e <br />80 <br />28 <br />1987 <br />APML MAY .ME JLLY AW <br />aoo <br />980 <br />„ soo <br />~ zso <br />200 <br />~j 180 <br />100 <br />80 <br />1988 <br />APFL MAY .urE JULY Aue <br />MONTH <br />Fig. 13. Relation between discharge and spawning period for <br />humpback chub, Yampa River, 1987-88. Vertical hors <br />delineate spawning period. <br />16 <br />