My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7300
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/24/2009 7:08:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7300
Author
Tyus, H. M. and C. A. Karp.
Title
Habitat Use and Streamflow Needs of Rare and Endangered Fishes, Yampa River, Colorado.
USFW Year
1989.
USFW - Doc Type
Biological Report 89(14),
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
for dispersal from upstream spawning grounds to <br />downstream nursery habitats (Tyus and McAda 1984; <br />Tyus 1986; Paulin et al., in review). These productive <br />nursery habitats are created during summer by <br />gradually decreasing flows following spring runoff. <br />Postlarval (young-of-the-year) Colorado squawfish are <br />rare in the Yampa River, the farthest upstream record <br />of postlarval Colorado squawfish in the Yampa River is <br />RK 24 (Haynes et al. 1984). <br />Juvenile <br />Distribution, abundance, and habitat use of juvenile <br />Colorado squawfish (60-450 mm total length) in the <br />Yampa River are poorly understood because of the <br />rarity of this life history stage (Miller et al. 1982; Wick <br />et a1.1983,1985). From 1980 to 1988, only 3% (N = 198) <br />of all Colorado squawfish greater than 60 mm collected <br />by Service biologists in the Yampa River were juveniles. <br />The downstream drift of larvae from Yampa River <br />spawning grounds suggests that along-distance <br />upstream movement by juveniles is needed to <br />repopulate upstream areas (Tyus 1986). Such <br />movement probably occurs during the late juvenile or <br />early adult stage, because only large-sized fish are found <br />in the upper Yampa River. This phenomenon is also <br />supported by data from the Green River showing large <br />concentrations of larger juvenile Colorado squawfish <br />(average electrofishing catch, > 0.18 fish per hour) in <br />the lower section of the mainstream Green River and <br />greatest concentrations of adults (average <br />electrofishing catch, > 0.6 fish per hour) in upstream <br />sections (Tyus et al. 1987). <br />Humpback Chub <br />Adult <br />Adult humpback chubs (> 230 mm) were captured <br />in canyon-bound habitat in the lower 89.6 km of the <br />Yampa River (Tyus et a1.1982a; Karp and Tyus 1989; C. <br />Haynes, personal communication) and in the lower <br />16 km of the Little Snake River (E. Wick, personal <br />communication; Fig. 4). Service biologists captured <br />seven adult humpback chubs in the Yampa River <br />(RK 28.8-75.2) from 1981 to 1985. From 1986 to 1988, <br />expanded efforts between RK 6.4 and 73.6 yielded <br />88 captures (9 recaptures). Adult humpback chubs <br />were most often collected in eddy habitat (average <br />depth, 2 m), particularly in shoreline eddies created by <br />large boulders and rapids (Karp and Tyus 1989). Adult <br />humpback chub were commonly captured with <br />roundtail chub and the introduced channel catfish <br />(Ictaktnts puiictatus; Karp and Tyus 1989). <br />Classification of the adult life history stage was based on <br />the smallest ripe humpback chub captured, a 232-mm <br />male in Whirlpool Canyon, Green River. <br />Spawning <br />Spawning of the humpback chub in Yampa Canyon <br />was documented in 1986 with the capture of two spent <br />females and two ripe males (Tyus et al. 1987). This was <br />confirmed in 1987 with the capture of 2 ripe females, <br />7 ripe males, and 11 tuberculated fish (sex not <br />determined, 2 recaptures); and in 1988 with the capture <br />of 1 ripe female, 5 ripe males, and 2 tuberculated fish <br />(1 1987 recapture; Karp and Tyus 1989). Thus, a total <br />of 32 mature humpback chubs (3 recaptures) were <br />captured in spawning condition in Yampa Canyon, <br />RK 19.2-64, in shoreline eddy and run habitat (Fig. 4). <br />Humpback chubs spawn shortly after peak spring flows <br />(Fig. 13; 1986 not included because sampling was <br />initiated following highest spring flows). This relation <br />has also been noted in the Blackrocks area of the upper <br />Colorado River (Valdez and Clemmer 1982; Archer et <br />al. 1985) and in the Little Colorado River, Arizona <br />(Kaeding and Zimmerman 1983; C. O. Minckley, <br />personal communication). <br />Although specific discrimination of Colorado River <br />Gila is problematical in some areas (Holden and <br />Stalnaker 1970; Valdez and Clemmer 1982), chubs <br />captured in the Yampa River in 1987 and 1988 were <br />226 <br />zoo <br />ne <br />1so <br />E <br />,,, 128 <br />c~ <br />g 100 <br />a ~e <br />80 <br />28 <br />1987 <br />APML MAY .ME JLLY AW <br />aoo <br />980 <br />„ soo <br />~ zso <br />200 <br />~j 180 <br />100 <br />80 <br />1988 <br />APFL MAY .urE JULY Aue <br />MONTH <br />Fig. 13. Relation between discharge and spawning period for <br />humpback chub, Yampa River, 1987-88. Vertical hors <br />delineate spawning period. <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.