My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7361
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7361
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/24/2009 7:08:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7361
Author
Tyus, H. M. and N. J. Nikirk.
Title
Abundance, Growth, and Diet of Channel Catfish,
USFW Year
1989.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
11 <br />Larger, more predacious channel catfish may experience difficulty in <br />capturing fish in the Green and Yampa rivers. Only the largest individuals <br />contained fish remains (average TL = 392 mm, n = 28) and whole fish were found <br />only in 12 stomachs (average TL = 446 mm). Fish species identified in stomach <br />contents included channel catfish (n = 9), suckers (n = 2), sculpin, Cottus <br />sp. (n = 1), and speckled dace, Rhinichthys osculus (n = 1). Our inspection <br />of stomachs could have missed partially digested larvae or postlarvae, but <br />some stomachs (n = 4) contained fish eggs. Although some of the fish <br />containing fish remains no doubt consumed the prey, the presence of large fish <br />bones, including vertebrae, in relatively smaller-sized channel catfish <br />indicated that many of the catfish were scavenging. The presence of large carp <br />scales in 10 individuals but no other fish parts, suggests some scale-feeding <br />behavior, as reported for marine catfish by Szelistowski (1989). Piscivory <br />only in larger catfish contrasts with other studies reporting piscivory by <br />smaller (50 to 200 mm) individuals (reviewed by Carlander, 1969). <br />The low incidence of piscivory we found may have been due to low prey <br />availability or other factors such as temperature or turbidity regimens. High <br />turbidity may limit the ability of channel catfish to capture fish as prey, <br />and turbidity effects on catfish suggested by Davis (1959) and Lynch and <br />Lemons (in litt.) may also apply to the Green River, in which the sediment <br />load fluctuates from 19 to 66,000 mg/1 and the suspended load from about 110 <br />to 1,700 mg/1 (Remilliard et al., 1988). Layher and Maughan (1985) reported <br />optimal water clarity for channel catfish as <30 mg/1 (reported in Jackson <br />Turbidity Units). <br />The variety of bottom foods in many channel catfish stomachs <br />(miscellaneous food category includes such camp garbage as rice, corn, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.