Laserfiche WebLink
suckers in the Green River are presumably old fish (Minckiey et al., in prep) <br />and no recruitment has been documented since the 1960s. <br />The apparent lack of widespread recruitment in razorback sucker has been <br />attributed to habitat alteration, such as lower water temperatures (Marsh <br />1985) and predation by introduced common carp Cyprinus car io, green sunfish, <br />channel catfish, flathead catfish Pvlodictus olivaris, and other non-native <br />fishes (Minckiey 1983; Brooks et al. 1985; Tyus 1987; Marsh and Langhorst <br />1988; Marsh and Minckiey 1989). Predation by non-native fishes is believed a <br />serious threat to the survival and recovery efforts of razorback sucker. The <br />absence of young fish in the Green River basin population may also be linked <br />with the reduced availability of inundated shorelines due to curtailment of <br />spring flooding following closure of Flaming Gorge Dam. Naturally inundated <br />lowlands such as Old Charley Wash and Stewart Lake Drain that were previously <br />accessible to razorback suckers in the spring are now not accessible due to <br />blockage and low water levels. The introduction of young fish (reared at Ouray <br />National Wildlife Refuge from gametes taken from wild fish) may ultimately <br />result in natural recruitment if the number of spawning adults, and <br />consequently the number of young fish, is increased. <br />Habitat requirements of this species in riverine environments are not <br />well known because of the scarcity of extant populations (Minckiey 1983; <br />Lanigan and Tyus 1989) and the absence of younger life history stages <br />(McCarthy and Minckiey 1987; Tyus 1987). Adult razorback suckers in the Green <br />River basin are old individuals (Tyus 1987; Minckiey et al., in prep.) and the <br />low number of reproducing razorback suckers is considered limiting (Lanigan <br />and Tyus 1989; Tyus and Karp 1990). We consider lower winter flows, high <br />spring flows, warming river temperatures, and inundated shorelines and <br />bottomlands as factors influencing the survival, successful reproduction, and <br />recruitment of this species. <br />SUMMARY <br />General <br />The Green River basin is an important riverine system for the maintenance <br />and recovery of the endangered Colorado River fishes. Flows of the tributary <br />Yampa River are singularly important for maintaining a spring peak on the <br />Green River hydrograph (Figure 3), thereby mitigating some of the adverse <br />effects of flow regulation by Flaming Gorge Dam on the native fish fauna. <br />Flows of the Yampa River, particularly spring runoff, may also enhance usable <br />fish habitat by inhibiting the invasion and proliferation of introduced fishes <br />that evolved in more mesic environments (Tyus and Karp 1989). Colorado <br />squawfish, razorback sucker and other native fishes depend on habitats in the <br />Yampa and Green rivers for fulfillment of various life history requirements, <br />and thus, the two rivers must be viewed as a single system when determining <br />flow needs. <br />The Green River basin supports the largest numbers of Colorado squawfish <br />(Tyus 1990) and razorback suckers (Lanigan and Tyus 1989) in native riverine <br />habitats. The humpback chub is presumed self-sustaining in DNM, but low <br />numbers make its status precarious (Karp and Tyus 1990a). The persistence of <br />26 <br />