Laserfiche WebLink
(including lower flows) or other conditions (e.g. temperature and fish <br />movements) which may favor growth and reproduction of channel catfish in the <br />Green River basin should be further evaluated. <br />Bonytail Chub <br />Habitat requirements of the bonytail chub in the Green River basin are <br />little known. Fish collections in Echo Park (DNM) before and after closure of <br />Flaming Gorge Dam indicated that the species was present in moderate numbers <br />at the confluence of Yampa and Green rivers (Vanicek 1967). However, more <br />recent investigations in that area have yielded few captures. Holden and <br />Stalnaker (1975) reported the capture of 36 bonytail chubs in Yampa (lower 16 <br />km) and upper Green rivers from 1968 to 1970. Holden and Crist (1981) <br />collected one bonytail chub in the lower Yampa River in 1979, and USFWS <br />biologists captured one suspected juvenile in 1987. Preliminary results of a <br />radiotracking study of adult bonytail chub introduced into the upper Green <br />River in 1988 and 1989 indicate that the fish exhibit crepuscular movements, <br />and are relatively quiescent during the day and night (S. Cranney, Utah <br />Division of Wildlife Resources, pers. comm.). <br />Bonytail chub have apparently declined in the Echo Park area, possibly <br />due to habitat changes resulting from closure of Flaming Gorge Dam. These <br />changes included alteration of flow and temperature patterns, and also a <br />reduction in the number of macroinvertebrate taxa (Pearson 1967), i.e., the <br />food base. A similar pattern has been noted in the Colorado River downstream <br />from Glen Canyon Dam (Utah State Department Fish and Game 1964, 1969). <br />Although the preimpoundment poisoning of riverine habitat in the upper Green <br />River in 1962 has been implicated in the decline of the bonytail chub in that <br />system, fish collections in DNM before and after the poisoning (Binns et al. <br />1963; Vanicek and Kramer 1969; Vanicek et al. 1970) suggested that the <br />downstream extent of the poison was not the only factor in the extirpation of <br />the species from the Echo Park area. Flaming Gorge Dam operations could affect <br />the future of bonytail chub re-introductions in the Green River system, and <br />these operations must be considered in future reintroduction efforts. <br />Razorback Sucker <br />Adult razorback suckers have been predominantly captured in the upper <br />Green River (km 282 - 552) and in the lower 21 km of the Yampa River (Azevedo <br />1962; Vanicek et al. 1970; Holden and Stalnaker 1975; Seethaler et al. 1979; <br />McAda and Wydowski 1980; Miller et al. 1982a; Tyus et al. 1982b; Tyus 1987; <br />Tyus and Karp 1990). Catch-effort estimates indicate that adult razorback <br />suckers are more rare than other native suckers and the endangered Colorado <br />squawfish (Table 1). <br />Radiotagged razorback suckers overwintered in the Jensen, and Island and <br />Echo parks reaches of Green River (McAda and Wydowski 1980; Valdez and <br />Masslich 1989). In winter, razorback suckers used slow runs, slackwaters, <br />eddies and backwaters in the Green River, where local movements increased <br />with increased discharge and flow fluctuations (Valdez and Masslich 1989). <br />Razorback suckers have been observed using large backwaters in the Ouray area <br />of the Green River during early spring (HMT). <br />24 <br />