My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7790
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7790
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:41:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7790
Author
Tyus, H. M., W. P. Dwyer and S. Whitmore.
Title
Feasibility of Preventing Further Invasion of the Zebra Mussel into the Western United States.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
water resources projects in the West <br />may be especially vulnerable to adverse <br />affects associated with zebra mussel <br />infestation in the East. <br />It is recognized that zebra mussels <br />may eventually colonize western areas. <br />However, if the present, rapid spread of <br />the zebra mussel could be reduced for <br />only a few years, it could save millions <br />of dollars in potential damages to water <br />management facilities. A delay in the <br />spread of the zebra mussel also would <br />allow for a more gradual conversion of <br />vulnerable facilities to develop and <br />install zebra mussel-resistant measures <br />It also could allow time for the <br />development of processes and proce- <br />dures for protecting sensitive species <br />and their environments judged at risk, <br />including threatened and endangered <br />species populations, and to develop <br />zebra mussel prevention and manage- <br />ment measures for them. <br />The mechanism of, and potential <br />impacts from zebra mussel infestation <br />into the Western United States are <br />unknown. Modes for its western <br />dispersal may be different than those in <br />the East. Therefore, actions necessary to <br />prevent or at least slow the spread must <br />first be identified before they can be <br />implemented. These activities would, <br />no doubt, be expensive and require an <br />extensive commitment from many <br />agencies and organizations. But the <br />potential for environmental and <br />economic losses dictates that attempts <br />be made to stop, or at best reduce the <br />spread of zebra mussels. <br />The U.S. Congress passed the <br />Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance <br />Prevention and Control Act of 1990 <br />(PL 101-646) in an attempt to reduce <br />the spread of a host of exotic species <br />that were already established, and to <br />further limit new introductions of <br />nonindigenous species. Although <br />much of the stimulus for the passage of <br />this act was due to the invasion of the <br />zebra mussel, efforts to date have done <br />little to prevent the spread of this <br />species into many waterways in North <br />America and prospects for its eradica- <br />tion are low. In this context, the U.S. <br />Congress, Office of Technology <br />Assessment (1993) recently completed <br />a comprehensive report on harmful <br />nonindigenous species in the United <br />States, and stated "...Federal and State <br />policies designed to protect us from the <br />worst species are not safeguarding our <br />national interests in important areas." <br />This Congressional report further <br />indicated that harmful nonindigenous <br />species are spreading because there is <br />little or no Federal guidance or <br />regulations, and State efforts to <br />regulate importation, possession, <br />introduction, and release of <br />nonindigenous species are generally <br />inadequate. <br />This report was initiated to develop <br />a framework for future efforts to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.