Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> <br />spawning period at a river discharge that approached 0 cfs. This condition <br />' violated the basic assumption that "fish require water", and was not <br />acceptable for stream flow recommendations. Other Yampa River applications of <br />these curves (USFWS 1987b) were made for adult and spawning Colorado <br />squawfish, and humpback chub. Optimum "physical habitat" was maximized near <br />' 0, 1200, and 400 cfs, respectively. The lack of supportive biological data <br />' and the Lack of agreement between these outputs, makes adoption of a single <br />flow difficult. Because of these and other problems, FWS, in 1987, suggested <br />that model outputs be validated with empirical data before being used as <br />guidelines in protecting endangered fish habitat in Iarge river systems. <br />1 <br />43 <br />