Laserfiche WebLink
~ 4 <br />sites was confirmed by collections of small larvae immediately downstream, but <br />not upstream of Gray and Yampa Canyons, from 1980 to present (Haynes et al <br />1984, Tyus et al 1987). It is possible that other spawning sites exist, <br />including a site in Labyrinth and Stillwater canyons in the lower Green River <br />(Tyus et al. 1987). If so, they are not as large as the other two areas. 1~ <br />Colorado squawfish spawning sites have been discovered in the Upper Main Stem <br />Colorado River, or elsewhere, despite years of study. <br />Homing behavior (Tyus 1985) has been noted in Colorado squawfish by long <br />distance movement patterns and recaptures of the same fish on spawning grounds <br />for a number of years (Tyus et al 1987, Wick et al 1983). A fidelity to these <br />spawning areas has also been demonstrated by repeated recaptures of the same <br />individuals on the same spawning grounds, and no fish has used more than one <br />spawning area (ie. no interchange of Yampa and Gray canyon spawners) (Tyus et <br />al 1987, Wick et al 1983). Additional unpublished FWS data also shows that <br />some fish pass through one spawning ground in route to another. Because Lack <br />of suitable spawning substrate is not judged a limiting factor, and migrating <br />fish pass through many km of apparantly suitable spawning areas, an olf actory <br />homing mechanism was proposed (Tyus 1985) to account for this behavior. <br />Turbid conditions in the Green River basin precludes direct observations of <br />spawning behavior of the fish in its natural riverine habitat. However, <br />radiotelemetry observations of spawning behavior in the wild were provided by <br />Archer and Tyus (1964), and Hamman (1981) noted the behavior of spawning fish ' <br />in a hatchery. Fish behavior is similiar to that described for a congener, the <br />8 <br />