Laserfiche WebLink
i .. <br />management activities. All require an extensive database management system to <br />organize, store, and make available the information that is collected. <br />Too often past programs have funded isolated studies and lacked the capability <br />to_consolidate and incorporate results. <br />Beginning in 1979, the Colorado River Fishes Project (Miller et al 1982s, <br />Wydoski and Aamill this volume), including cooperative states of Colorado <br />and Utah, has aided in reducing isolationism by supporting annual research <br />meetings among upper Basin workers,~nd is producing needed information for <br />recovery programs. is is further supported by the RIP, whose methods <br />include regular meetings of a technical review group, and annual review of <br />past work in which needed studies and information are prioritized, and funds <br />are allocated, as available to obtain information. USFWS, under the RIP, is <br />proceeding to computerize the extensive, amounts of data collected by federal, <br />state and private agencies and individuals for use in the recovery effort. <br />Until recently, studies of the habitat needs and other limiting factors <br />controlling the distribution and abundance of the endemic Colorado River <br />fishes have been done piecemeal, with very limited budgets. Study of the <br />Colorado River fauna is difficult and costly. Yet much of the habitat <br />alterations noted have been caused by the construction of federal reservoirs <br />that produce large revenues. It is only proper that some of these funds be <br />used to aid in the recovery of the endemic fauna that is left, and indeed, <br />much of the funding for the upper Basin recovery effort has been contributed <br />by the Bureau of Reclamation. Viewed in this light, the cost of recovery has <br />amounted to only a very small percent of the money produced by hydroelectric <br />35 <br />