My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7384
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7384
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:41:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7384
Author
Tyus, H. M.
Title
Colorado Squawfish.
USFW Year
n.d.
USFW - Doc Type
Vernal, Utah.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Impacts of introduced fishes (reviewed by Taylor et al 1984) are seldom <br />understood, and largely inferred from major alterations of species composition <br />in an area. Competition (reviewed by Connell 1983, Ross 198b) between native <br />and introduced forms is difficult to observe experimentally, and perhaps <br />impossible to prove in natural riverine habitats. Direct effects of fish <br />introductons on native fishes were categorized and reviewed by Moyle et al <br />(1981): Elimnination, reduced growth and survival, changes in community <br />structure, and no effect. These authors stressed that many fish are introduced <br />(~ into habitats that are also changiag due to the effects of man, making it <br />~~i difficult to determine if habitat change, competition, or both, are <br />responsible for decline of the natives. To confound this already complex <br />issue, in the past, species interactions were not well understood, and never <br />studied before introductions were made. Introductions of new species into <br />areas to promote better sport fishing has often created more problems than <br />solving them, primarily because methods for predicting outcomes are few (Li <br />and Moyle 1981). <br />The introduction of non-native fishes in the Colorado River has been <br />documented by many, and present status provided by Minckley (1982) and Tyus <br />et al. (1982a). The impacts of these introductions on decline of the Colorado <br />squawfish remains problematic, differing among life stages, temporally and <br />spatially: <br />Larvae- Small Colorado squawfish are eaten by other fishes, and probably <br />compete with young of other species as well. Study of predation upon small <br />larval Colorado squawfish is difficult because the fragile larvae may be <br />32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.