My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7384
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7384
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:41:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7384
Author
Tyus, H. M.
Title
Colorado Squawfish.
USFW Year
n.d.
USFW - Doc Type
Vernal, Utah.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />been recaptured in the last 8 years (L. Kaeding, personal communication). An <br />additional 76,000 age-0 (50-125 mm TL) fish were stocked between 1982 and <br />1984. Some of these fish have been recaptured, but it is presumed that they <br />n,?c1nt~ z L,(~L <br />have not been4large enough~to be vulnerable to sampling gear (L. Kaeding, <br />personal communication). <br />`` Reintroduction of Colorado squawfish into areas of. the lower Colorado River <br />ire ~ <br />~f~ Lr,,~ <br />~~~'~ where they have been extirpated was initiated in 1987, by the Arizona Game and <br />'~ ~V1Qv~' Fish Department, and FWS, Dexter National Fish Hatchery. It is t\o,~o soon to <br />~,pD'>~ ~\ determine the success of that endeavor. ~- (~ tN rev l ~' S S Y _OLkt. ~ " <br />P ~~, ~os21 _ ~ ~Z s Sz ~ ~ ~ `".'1-~-~„ ~~ 11(l. ~ ro S ~c-t-e ~S <br />~` ~~ ` I <br />~ ~wa`~+e~~{ Fish stocking programs can benefit management for recovery, but only in <br />~~~ '`~ coordination with a com rehensive program in which life requirements of target <br />P <br />r~~ species are understood, and met by sites in which stocking occurs. It is noted <br />~(oGQPi 0" <br />that the loss of habitat is the prime cause of loss of native fishes in the <br />Colorado River Basin, reintroduction of fishes back into habitats that were <br />not suitable when they were lost, is, at best, a stop-gap measure (Rinne et al <br />1985). Fish culture dominated fishery science in the United States for at <br />least 50 years. Regarded as a panacea to stop the loss of fisheries, it was <br />not until t,#~'1930-40 dgca~d'e that research highlighted the need for habitat <br />protection and management (Radonski and Martin 1981). In the past, fish <br />culture was not directed at the restoration of endangered fishes; rather, it <br />was directed at restoring sport fishing. e, here are many research <br />needs that remain to be answered regarding the use of hatcheries, and stocking <br />p to ~r t Yv` ,Y+~',~6 r' <br />in management for recovery. Altkoul;h stocking o t e aym n,~ <br />S~2LtGS W~+S~~Ct~v.~ ~ <br />f~11 ~:~that.-s~c~cip,~.~ha-~' are rare and endangered^ abitat loss <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.