My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7384
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7384
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:41:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7384
Author
Tyus, H. M.
Title
Colorado Squawfish.
USFW Year
n.d.
USFW - Doc Type
Vernal, Utah.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P x4'1 ~1\ wc.T(s 6 <br />,1 <br />requiremente of various life stages of the Colorado squawfish. Because water <br />~,1 i <br />~w~-~ ~t <br />pLru~, <br />`S I <br />~ar.~ , <br />(pV~~~S 1 <br />~~~ <br />s Wo.¢ iv <br />~r~1, <br />\r <br />~~- 3~[ 5 <br />~ \I. <br />o~ w` <br />resources in the and west are hotly contested, identified life requirements <br />for water must be biologically defensible. These flow issues are national and <br />international in scope, potentially affecting water resources allocations <br />between the United States, Mexico, and the states of California, Colorado, <br />Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming. <br />The picture is also cloudy from an ecological perspective. Determination of <br />instream flow needs of nonendangered fishes in natural stream sections with <br />other native species need not be as exacting as for endangere`d fishes in <br />V,, Na w e.v~.zwSC J't iL'? S c ~.~a <br />altered streams with nonnative competitors. I~ the former situat~on, mistakes <br />can be corrected in time through reestablishment of natural populations. If <br />the stream in question is a put-and-take recreational fishery, more hatcher <br />reared fish can be stocked. In case of the etc Colorado River fauna : <br />e,~l2~w <br />~'nstream flow determination is deadly serious. Limitei gene pools shouj.d not <br />not absolutely required to do so! Therefore, determination and implementation <br />rf2 QY2v-C.~ I s V~VLG 2 r <br />be sacrificed, and no successful, self sustaining population of this fish has <br />~~- GZIn. ov c~o~~w~tv~~'`~is ~ <br />ever bees reestablished onc~ it has been lost. No ecologist wishes to <br />~~G ~ 6~ <br />participate in the era 11 n of this faun"a~ *~.r^~~~ ~ ~'^' ^f pr fessional <br />a~ L ~,i~^~~~ a2l't~ grsl/ ~5 Sir-'0. ~~ = ~~o`.. o~ S 1, t, d~ ~ Ct~'Cs <br />3udgement ~ And no water resources planner wishes to give up water rights if <br />a <br />of instream flow ds is, at best, nearly impossible! ~ ~~ ~~~~Gr <br />.. <br />~e~re ~ <br />st~.,11 ~c. d~-~~ I'o ~eF~~c`~c-r1 hee~1s. ~oc~7'7 (q.~ o~- ~~s~ w~~~ ~~~~wa <br />~ ~ ~ ~+ ~ I~f~MRC~PC~ '•,~r~w "~G ~ ~~`d 1rd LRILKC(~. -.~ <br />~n my opinion, recovery nee s o s es are est studie wee e s are <br />most abundant, in the Ieast altered, and most historic location; with the <br />premise that conditions to which they are best adapted are those in which they <br />~~9{~~nkh+l~~- To ~! ~ZrV~c~ ~o~~~t[+~`~" Tloler2vlLe ~ ~v1~rn1/t~~v-1Z~ <br />~ ~ ~~-e i,~ CS . `"I, ~ <br />`~ <br />are most likely to maintain a competitive advantage over introduced forms. In <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.