Laserfiche WebLink
<br />usual population estimation constraints, and 7. A computed overall average <br />using the summation of the output of all above methods. Methods used to <br />compute these approximations are presented in the Appendix. <br />All of the abundance appraximations are summarized in Table 2. Although <br />the methodology used was admittedly crude, and some were based on different <br />manipulations of similiar data sets, I believe the resultant range of axerages <br />-10$5¢ d.- @ w w ~2'~ <br />(3,875 - 17,252 fish) is realistic for the mainstream Green~River. The grand <br />average of all approximations, about 8,000 adult fish, was reasonable. 1~ie <br />accuracy of these approximations is unknown However, the precision obtained <br />~-- /~1 N L <br />in so doing this work was surprisingly god. This high degree of pre~ision <br />obtained, implies that an inherent bias was common in all methods attempted, <br />or suggests that the grand average is reasonably accurate. <br />-------------------------------------------- - - : Tim tc s-~R,~e~ <br />~~ /~` U <br />Table 2. Six approximations of the population size of Colorado squawfish in <br />the upper Green River, 0-552 km. <br />Approximate population size <br />Method -------------------------------------------------- <br />range of values average <br />1 - ~ 7,176 <br />2 775-3,875 2,326 <br />16 <br />