Laserfiche WebLink
f <br />Table 2. Means-. tests: for significant difference in percept <br />co~npasiton between itiritiaY. seiure trauzs- and: the total comgo-stion. <br />`1L` indieates~ adultls~ubadult a-nd `Y' indicates vounet-o€-ueax. <br />S~ ~ P a: 1 To ? -Ra-1'. ~ Species Pass 1 vT otall +P- value <br />KS~ Y 57".8= 54.0" :OS= MffC' 69.5 G`I'.£~ .51 <br />LAS A 13:..4- 13 .-3- . 9.6~ RS 1~ 19.1 1~ : 4 .81 <br /> <br />SSA 4-. 6 4 . g: _ ~2.. S~ A 4.8 ~. ~ .13 <br /> <br />F~ A ~ 1.3 1~.~¢. _.~- ~. ~. 5.6 -~i_S~ .20 <br />ce 0.9 2 : i . €~~= CC O.Ob ~:$- . 04 <br />CS 1..1 1: 4 ..3'4' CS- 0.9 ff. T .23 <br /> a _t-obe ~ g~ ~~- ~ ~ z~~~~ <br />A <br />~p~~es PaSS 1 To ~~ P , <br />-~r trr ~_ cep Pas 1 `t'o ~-1 P=va ~ <br />NI~C ~~8 99~.T~ .f~~'-. Mme.. 99.7 9~.~ .47 <br /> <br />CS 0 .:05 0'. E~'~: . ~3` RTC 0.3 E~. i . 34 <br />GS O~:I~ D". Z' ,_E~~ ~~ 0.03- -El:l.ff .36 <br />LS~P sa~pling..is regresentati~e of .th:e relatige abundan~~.~f <br />the- tno~re co~non species- witfi. the. exception of cYanr~el catfish <br />(~ctaluris pB~ctatus) . Col~o-rado sg~awfsh, although rare compared <br />ta' the . common NNC, were. rael~. represented in the first hail . <br />Squa~rfish were- present at ZB sites,- and vaete: coilected..on the: fist <br />pass 23 t~es~ (82~) . <br />SeQerai..additional species-were calle.cted. in sma].:,1. numbers: an <br />each trip: Further seinin-g produced,. 1-~ rto.re species- per. section. <br />Most ~rere~ n-on=nati~ sge~c~e~,. but s care ~ nati~re=~ the~;e <br />Wig: <br />were flannelmouth sucker, bltiehead. sucFcer: and: speckled- dace... It.~s <br />widely be-sieved and generaiiy accepted -that these species: d©~ not <br />p~refe~rer~tially utili:z~e backwater habitats, therefore- we cant <br />expect them to be aceurately~. rep-rese-meted- by ISMP seining Hence, <br />althoughi- diversity was shin to k~e significantly hr~her in total <br />