Laserfiche WebLink
<br />t!m <br />80 ... _- -------------- -•----- -------------------------- <br />F- <br />~ 6Q - - - - - -- - <br />U_~ - <br />. 20 <br />0 <br />RS SS- F@F- C~ ~ GS (:G` SD FN[• R~ R~ PK li~S `CP BH <br />SPECIES= <br />Figure 3. Comparison a~ the frequene~ of occurrence of each species <br />and• the frequenc~p of: being. missed in the .f:irst se3he <br />haul . Data --rerere pooled .fc~~ aii trips and:. sites . <br />,Capture probabilities were generated-for each section. In <br />general, initial capture. prol~abili~~r- was agproximate:ly ~Q~, with <br />~25°s CI EF'igure 4} , Tfie_- ~~~,,~•- range. in: ~aiues was .0:3 to ..94, a-nd <br />occurred in~ August. The lowest -value occurred in. a section <br />inhahited. by extremely, sma11_ YCY I~b~C,- which escaped through -the <br />mesh of the seine. The Yighest. vale-e occurred in a sma-11, but deep <br />backwater that- was •comp~letei~ blacker into one sectYOn-. SaAtpli-ng <br />efficienc~r appears to- he. lowest ~. sections: with few total. fish. <br />Values- €csr alI trips ..are given in the appendix. <br />