Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DRAFT 18 <br />~~~ <br />October) and squawfish growth and size (Total Length in mm) in the fall and following spring. <br />~, Dp <br />Linear regression analysis produced r2 values of .68 for spring TL, and 0.46 for fall TL. <br />Although 1992 and 1994 were warmest and produced the lamest fish; and 1995 was coldest and <br />produced the smallest fish, the other years were inconsistent (Table 11). There was also a <br />significant negative correlation (Pearson's -.99, p = .002) between total degree day accumulation <br />and peak flow. The USGS data was used because it was the most continuous, available for all <br />years of the study, and is highly correlated with thermograph data ~,J , <br />~. ~~~ <br />?~f ~ <br />Table 10. Significant differences in mean maximum and average main channel and backwater <br />temneratures_ Green River 1993-199( <br />Test P= Test p= <br />MC AVCa MC AVG/BA AVG <br />93-94 .06 93 BAl 5.0 E-5 <br />93-95 .004 93 BAZ 4.4 E-8 <br />94-95 2.5 E-8 P < •~° I 94 .023 <br /> 95 BAl 8.1 E-15 <br />MC AVG/USGS 95 BA2 3.2 E-5 <br />93 .003 <br />94 2.4 E-9 P ~ • vo ~ MC MAX/ BA MAX <br />95 1.9 Fry p ~,OG~ 93 .35 <br /> 94 .02 <br /> 95 .19 <br />-18- <br />