My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9292
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9292
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:40:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9292
Author
Trammell, M. and T. Chart.
Title
Aspinall Unit Studies Nursery Habitat Studies Colorado River 1992--1996.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
Moab, Utah.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6 <br />Physical Habitat <br />The average spring peak flow is 36,155 cfs for the period of record (1914-1996) which <br />encompasses both pre- and post-regulation periods for the Colorado River, near Cisco. The historic <br />peak (pre-regulation) was 73,200 cfs (tJSGS gage),~and the highest post-regulation peak (after 1961) <br />was 69,500 cfs, in 1984. Interestingly, the 3"' and 4`~ highest peaks occurred during this study, in <br />1993 and 1995. Based on the average peak, this study encompassed 21ow water years (<50% of <br />avg.), 2 high water years (>130% of avg.) and one moderate year (80% of avg.). Physical habitat <br />variables of interest, and catch of Colorado squawfish and NNCs were summarized for each sampling <br />occasion. The data are grouped by year and season in Tables 2 and 3. <br />The relationships between peak flow, sampling flows, and habitat quantity were tested using <br />Peazson's correlations (Table 4). On all occasions, there was a negative correlation between higher <br />sampling flows and habitat availability, although the results were only significant to the O.151evel at <br />best. More significant negative correlations were seen between peak flows and habitat quantity in the <br />summer in the upper section, and between peak and fall habitat in the lower section. <br />Rakowski and Schmidt (1996) studied asand-bedded reach of the Green River similar to the <br />Colorado River reaches. They suggested that habitat quantity may decrease in the year of a high peak <br />flow, but that the following year or years may benefit as lower floods in succeeding years scour bars <br />created during a high flow yeaz, thereby increasing habitat complexity and quantity. Therefore, the <br />relationship between peak flow offset by 1 and 2 years and the fall habitat availability was also tested. <br />There was no correlation between a 1-year previous peak flow and habitat. A slight negative <br />correlation observed on the 2-year offset was an artifact of the similarity between the patterns of <br />peak flows offset by two years, 1990-1994 and 1992-1996. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.