Laserfiche WebLink
<br />LITERATURE REVIEW <br />' Sand-bedded rivers have been the focus of much study, often because of their impact on <br />humans. Early engineering studies focused on reducing the impacts of flooding and migrating <br />' rivers on human structures, but more recently geomorphologists have endeavored to improve the <br />understanding of why and how rivers fonn, migrate, and change. Only recently have <br />geomorphologists combined their efforts with biologists and ecologists to discern the effects of <br />' physical attributes and changes in those attributes on the ecology of river systems. <br />Geomorphology of Sand-Bedded Rivers <br />1 Self-Formed Channels <br />Continually adjusting streams that flow within banks composed of material previously <br />transported by the river are termed self-formed channels and are the focus oflong-standing <br />geomorphic research. The Green River within the alluvial Ouray NWR reach is an example of a <br />self-formed channel. For self-formed channels, the channel form at a given cross section is <br />determined by discharge, quantity and character of the sediment in transport, and bank and bed <br />characteristics [Leopold et al., 1964]. Consequently, in channels with a moveable bed and banks, <br />channel form results from the dynamic interaction of bank stability, flow, and sediment transport <br />[Leopold et al., 1964]. This relationship is dynamic because in natural rivers neither bank and <br />bed material nor flow conditions are uniform in space or time. <br />Classic geomorphic research on self-formed streams such as Watts Branch (Maryland), <br />Brandywine Creek (Pennsylvania), and Baldwin Creek (Wyoming) measured characteristic <br />parameters of streams such as the spacing of pools and riffles, distribution of sediment sizes on <br />the bed, bedload movement, channel shape through meanders, velocity distribution within cross <br />sections, and the relationship between flood recurrence and bankfull channel size [Leopold et al., <br />1964]. These studies quantified many geomorphic relationships, but they did not reveal the <br />' physical processes underlying those relationships. More recent work, at both large (kilometers) <br />and small (meters) scales, has endeavored to study and model the physical processes that create <br />channel form. <br />' Meanderin Rivers <br />g <br />' Self-formed channels have been classified as straight, meandering, braided, or <br />anastomosing; each planform type is a response to the interaction of discharge, sediment size and <br />availability, and bank and bed characteristics [Rosgen, 1994; Leopold et al., 1964]. Subsequent <br />work has shown that these forms actually describe end-members of a continuum of channel <br />patterns that have many causes [van den Berg, 1995]. Early studies argued that braided streams <br />typically have high sediment loads in relation to transport capacity, straight rivers have low <br />sediment loads, and meandering rivers have approximately equal sediment loads and transport <br />capacity [Leopold et al., 1964]. <br />Much controversy has surrounded the origins of flow meandering. Is meandering caused <br />' by the deflection of current around alternate bars, causing additional deposition on the bars and <br />erosion on the exterior of the bend, or are the barforms determined by the flow patterns? What <br />physical properties control meander wavelength and amplitude? Rhoads and Welford [ 1991 ] <br />noted that no universal theory of meandering initiation has emerged, although the most <br />' A-3 <br />