Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />u <br /> <br />F <br />LIST OF FIGURES <br />1. General and detailed location maps for the study reaches ...................... A-2 <br />2. Detailed topographic maps of the study bar in 1993 and 1994 showing the three <br />units that compose the bar as determined by elevation ........................ A-6 <br />3. Water surface and thalweg elevation for the US Geological Survey stream gage <br />Green River neaz Ouray, Utah for the period 1951 to 1965 ..................... A-7 <br />4. Longitudinal profile of the Green River .................................. A-13 <br />5. Average annual hydrographs for the Yampa River and the Green River near <br />Jensen, Utah . ....................................................... A-14 <br />6. Recurrence interval of instantaneous peak flow for the Green River near Jensen, <br />Utah .............................................................. A-16 <br />7. Annual peak discharge for the Green River near Jensen, Utah ................. A-16 <br />8. Five-year moving average of September mean monthly discharge .............. A-17 <br />9. Five-year moving averages of mean monthly discharge for December, January, <br />and February ....................................................... A-18 <br />10. Hydrograph of mean daily discharge for the study period showing dates of cross- <br />section measurements and Reclamation video overflights .................... A-23 <br />11. Stage/discharge relationship developed for the 1.5-km study reach ............. A-24 <br />12. Simulation hydrographs ............................................... A-28 <br />13. Comparison ofmodel-generated and field-measured average cross-section <br />longitudinal bed elevation for May 1994 .................................. A-29 <br />14. Comparison of the topography interpolated by the numerical flow model in relation <br />to the detailed bar topography and 1.5-km reach topography determined from video <br />data in July 1994 .................................................... A-31 <br />15. Detailed topographic map of the study bar in 1993 and 1994 .................. A-33 <br />16. Comparison ofpseudo-topographic units interpreted from the video prints to the <br />detailed topographic maps (Figure 15) ................................... A-42 <br />A-vi <br />