Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />14 <br />Fish escapement from the reservoir is common and high. Several <br />species have escaped downstream into the White River from the reservoir <br />(e.g., black crappie, green sunfish, brown trout, rainbow trout. A 1987 <br />creel census (CDOW unpublished data) showed as many rainbow trout caught <br />below the dam as above. The stocked squawfish behaved similarly. <br />No precise estimate of the numbers of squawfish that left the <br />reservoir is possible, but clearly it was a large proportion of those <br />stocked. Effort was not commensurate between the two areas. However, <br />since effort (in 100 mz seined) was not correlated (r2=.0002) to number of <br />fish caught (Figure 3), estimates based on the proportions of the total <br />number of squawfish recaptured above (including the White River above the <br />reservoir) and below the dam from 1988 to 1990, should be fairly <br />representative for the area sampled. The correlation was based only on <br />seining since this method captured 99.9% of the fish in the study. <br />However, because only a portion of the White River was sampled, it can be <br />assumed that a greater fraction of squawfish left the reservoir than <br />indicated by recaptures. The percentage of squawfish recaptured below the <br />dam varied from 18.5% to 45% (Table 4), but total escapement could be much <br />higher. <br />Table 5. Total recaptures of current year classes of Colorado <br />squawfish above and below Taylor Draw Dam, 1988 through 1990. <br /> 1988 1989 1990 <br />No. stocked 17,000 32,000 ~ 47,597 <br />Recap. above dam (%) 66 (81.5) 246 (55) 373 (80) <br />Recap. below dam (%) 15 (18.5) 201 (45) 93 (20) <br />Total no recaptured 81 447 466 <br />recaptured of number stocked 0.4 1.4 1.0 <br /> <br />