My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7770
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7770
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:39:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7770
Author
Trammell, M. A.
Title
Evaluation of Colorado Squawfish Stocking in Kenney Reservoir, Rangely, Colorado.
USFW Year
1991.
USFW - Doc Type
Colorado State University,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />t <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />J <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />6 <br />Stocking <br />Dexter National Fish Hatchery in New Mexico provided Colorado <br />squawfish eggs to hatchery facilities at Willow Beach, Nevada, where the <br />squawfish were raised for the stocking program. The initial goal of <br />150,000 squawfish over three years was not met. A total of 96,597 <br />fingerlings were stocked into Kenney Reservoir. All stocked squawfish <br />received an internal tetracycline mark and an external batch <br />identification mark (Table 1). <br />Table 1. Lengths, weights, and identification marks of Colorado <br /> squawfish stocked in Kenney Reservoir, 1988, 1989 and 1990. <br /> <br />Stock No. Length (TL mm) Weight (4) Batch <br />date CSF range x range x mark <br /> <br />4/28/88 17,000 49-90 65 1-6 3.0 left pelvic clip <br />4/26/89 32,000 41-80 58 1-5 2.2 right pelvic clip <br />5/24/90 32,000 51-101 73 1-10 3.4 red spray mark <br />8/06/90 1,397 96-141 114 --- 7.0 left pelvic clip <br />X1,_,/90 14,200 73-172 114 2-30 10.3 yellow spray mark <br />Total 96 597 <br />Samp]ing <br />For each sampling method except seining, all fish large enough for <br />field identification were counted and identified. All fish species <br />collected in the study and their codes and status are listed in Table 2. <br />For large seine hauls (high numbers of fish), the total number of fish was <br />estimated and the relative abundance of each species derived from either <br />a subsample of the haul, or ratios based on hauls in which all fish were <br />counted and identified. Species of interest were measured (to the nearest <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.