My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8159
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8159
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:38:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8159
Author
Trammell, M. and T. Chart.
Title
Aspinall Studies
USFW Year
1999.
USFW - Doc Type
Annual Assessment of Colorado Pikeminnow Larval Production in the Colorado River, Utah 1992-1996 \
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Relationship of flow and temperature variables to spawning <br />The average spring peak flow at the USGS Cisco gage, is 1024 m3/s for the period of <br />record (1914-1996) which encompasses both pre- and post-regulation periods for the Colorado <br />River. The historic peak (pre-regulation) was 2073 m3/s, and the highest post-regulation peak <br />(after 1961) was 1968 m3/s, in 1984. Based on the average peak, this study encompassed 21ow <br />water years; 1992 and 1994 (<50% of avg.), 2 high water years; 1993 and 1995 (>130% of avg.) <br />and one moderate year, 1996 (80% of avg.). The magnitude of the peak discharge at the two <br />gaging stations was strongly correlated (rz = 0.998, p = 0.0001), and the hydrographs followed <br />very similar patterns (Figure 4a-e). <br />For ease of discussion, flow and temperature data from the Cisco gage will be used for <br />the remainder of this discussion. Further, the Moab catch data will be emphasized because catch <br />rates were likely the result of the two spawning sites combined. Other variables such as onset of <br />spawning and temperatures were not substantially different between the sites. A summary of <br />flow and temperature data is given in Table 4. <br />The magnitude of the peak flow (highest daily mean) was correlated to average monthly <br />flows in May, June, July, and August (Figure 7). The rz values for each month are: May, rz <br />=0.63; June, rz=0.96; July, rz x.73; Aug, rz = 0.78. Peak flows were also related to the date of <br />the peak (rz = 0.70). The higher the peak, the later the date, and the longer the flows remained <br />high. The peak discharge usually occurs near the end of May or the first of June, with the runoff <br />period of high flows continuing throughout the month of June. <br />Table 4. Summary of flow and temperature for the Colorado River, USGS gage at Cisco, <br />1992-1996. <br />Variable 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 <br />Peak discharge a <br />(ms/s) 484 1348 424 1455 813 <br />Avg June flow 232 782 255 1044 508 <br />Avg July flow 128 330 79 810 200 <br />Avg Aug flow 103 155 73 234 88 <br />date of peak May 29 May 29 May 21 June 19 May 20 <br />onset of spawn June 11 June 29 June 5 July 11 June 23 <br />date of 18°C June 1 June 23 May 25 July 17 June 25 <br />DDb to spawn 1684 1806 1600 2210 1868 <br />DDb through July 2864 2478 2966 2582 2730 <br />DDb through August 3546 3250 3742 3242 3479 <br />a: Peak discharge was the highest daily mean discharge. <br />b: DD =degree day accumulation <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.