My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8159
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8159
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:38:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8159
Author
Trammell, M. and T. Chart.
Title
Aspinall Studies
USFW Year
1999.
USFW - Doc Type
Annual Assessment of Colorado Pikeminnow Larval Production in the Colorado River, Utah 1992-1996 \
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
INTRODUCTION <br />The Gunnison River joins the Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO, contributing an <br />average of 60% to the Colorado River peak discharge. The discharge of the Gunnison River is <br />controlled by three large dams collectively called the Aspinall Unit, which were completed in the <br />late 1960's. The construction and operation of the Aspinall Unit dams has had a major effect on <br />the Gunnison and Colorado rivers by regulating flows to control floods, store water, and provide <br />power. All of these factors attenuate the spring peak flows, increase late summer/winter flows, <br />and otherwise alter the natural flow regime (McAda and Kaeding, 1991). The alteration of <br />natural flows in the Colorado River may affect the reproductive timing and successful <br />recruitment of fishes, including the endangered Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius) <br />(USFWS, 1987; Osmundson and Kaeding, 1991). Flows in the Colorado River in Utah are also <br />influenced by several tributaries which join the Colorado River downstream of the Gunnison <br />River, the largest of which is the Dolores River, which contributes an average of 10% of the flow <br />during peak discharge. <br />Colorado pikeminnow spawn on the descending limb of the hydrograph in June and July <br />as water temperatures rise (Haynes et al. 1984; Osmundson et al. 1995). Following hatch, larvae <br />emerge from the substrate, become entrained in the current below spawning areas and are <br />transported to nursery habitat areas which may be located substantial distances downstream. <br />Drift by larval Colorado pikeminnow has been documented in the Yampa, Green and Colorado <br />Rivers (Kesler et al. 1988; Valdez et al. 1985; Bestgen et al. 1998). Drifting larval fish can be <br />collected using passive drift nets. <br />The goal of this study, conducted from 1992 to 1996, was to determine the current status <br />and characteristics of reproductive success of Colorado pikeminnow and other fish in the upper <br />mainstem Colorado River and the effect of flows on reproduction. This study was conducted on <br />the Colorado River in Utah, under the Aspinall Unit Study Plan of the Colorado River Recovery <br />Implementation Program. The specific objectives were to use collections of drifting larvae to <br />evaluate the effect of flows on: 1) timing and duration of Colorado pikeminnow drift and <br />spawning, 2) relative abundance of drifting Colorado pikeminnow larvae, and 3) to determine if <br />relative abundance of larvae varies similarly with the relative abundance of juveniles in the <br />nursery habitats in the fall. This report covers two study sites in Utah administered by the Utah <br />Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR), with additional information supplied by Colorado <br />Division of Wildlife (CDOW) on a concurrent larval drift study on several sites on the Colorado <br />and Gunnison rivers within Colorado (Anderson 1999). <br />METHODS <br />Two sites on the Colorado River within Utah were sampled. Site selection was <br />dependent on previous collection sites of YOY pikeminnow, and the location of suspected <br />spawning areas upstream. The upstream, or Westwater site, first located slightly above River <br />Kilometer (RK) 212.4 near the Colorado-Utah border, was relocated in the second year, to RK <br />205.1 at the Westwater Ranger Station, below a suspected spawning site near the Colorado-Utah <br />border (Doug Osmundson, personal communication). The downstream, or Moab site was also <br />moved after the first year for improved access. It was relocated at RK 105.2, approximately 1.0 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.